Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
If it is true that 'Good governance implies law and order in society' then identify the statement which has to be accepted along with the given statement?
पर्याय
An able government very effectively uses laws to promote peace.
A strong government uses force to impose laws.
Law is indispensable for society.
A healthy society is governed by maximum number of laws.
Advertisements
उत्तर
An able government very effectively uses laws to promote peace.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The following question has two statements P and Q. They may look factually absurd. You have to ignore this absurdly and concentrate only upon the logic involved in its statement.
Mark the answer as
P: All fish can fly. Some fish are birds. All birds are naughty. Therefore some naughty can fly.
Q: Some fish are birds. All birds are naughty. Therefore all fish are naughty.
Instructions for Question:
The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
Main statement: The computer will not work if the operating system fails.
1. Operating system fails.
2. The operating system does not fail.
3. The computer does not work.
4. The computer works.
The ordered pair of statements is:
Choose the most appropriate option:
If it is false that 'There is at least one octogenarian in the room', then which one of the following is probable?
Choose the most appropriate option:
A, B, C and D have got some money with them. If A gives 8 rupees to B, B will have as much as C has and A will have 3 rupees less than what C has. Also if A takes 6 rupees from C, A will have twice as much money as D. If B and D together have 50 rupees, how much money does A and B have respectively?
The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set, which gives the most logical triad. i.e. the third statement mentioned should be a conclusion drawn from the first two statements.
- X and Y are siblings.
- X and Y do not quarrel.
- Siblings are known to quarrel often.
- X and Y quarrel often.
- All those who quarrel are siblings.
- X and Y cannot be siblings.
Read the following case and answer the question.
Sakshi is the Vice-President in an electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request "Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team. Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen's former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience. Lalit has described Kishen as to author it alive to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an ailing wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife.
Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above
I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen visit a family counsellor.
Sakshi sought an appointment with Lalit to find out ways to help Kishen. Lalit is of the view that the company's responsibility is restricted to the workplace and it should not try to address the personal problems of employees. If Sakshi has to agree to Lalit's view, which of the solutions presented in the previous question would be weakened?
Read the following case and answer the question.
Sakshi is the Vice-President in an electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request "Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team. Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen's former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience. Lalit has described Kishen as to author it alive to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an ailing wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife.
Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above
I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen visit a family counsellor.
Which of the following statements, if true would weaken the decision to sack Kishen the most?
Experts musicologists believe that Beethoven wrote his last piano sonata in 1824, three years before his death. However, the manuscript of a piano sonata was recently discovered that bears Beethoven's name and dates from 1825. Clearly, the experts are mistaken because not every piece that Beethoven wrote was cataloged in his lifetime, and it is known that Beethoven continued to compose until just weeks before his death.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the question that follows
Cocoa and chocolate products have been used as medicine in many cultures for centuries. Chocolate is made from plants. which means it contains many of the health benefits of leafy vegetables.
Which of the following statements weakens the above argument?
- Dark chocolate contains a large number of antioxidants which slow down the ageing process.
- A small study revealed that regular intake of chocolate increases insulin sensitivity, thus lowering the chances of diabetes.
- Green leafy vegetables have substances which protect skin from UV rays.
- Chocolates have three types of fats, one of which increases the cholesterol level.
- Cocoa increases blood flow to the retina, thus giving a boost to vision.
The question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. The course of action is a step for administrative decisions to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the given suggested courses of action is/are logically worth pursuing.
Statement The expert's group on technical education has stressed that computer education should be provided to children from the primary school itself. It should be implemented in urban and rural schools, simultaneously.
Courses of Action
I. The government should issue instructions to all schools for computer education.
II. At least one teacher from each school should be trained in computer operations for teaching children.
