मराठी

If It is False that 'There is at Least One Octogenarian in the Room', Then Which One of the Following is Probable?

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Choose the most appropriate option:

If it is false that 'There is at least one octogenarian in the room', then which one of the following is probable? 

पर्याय

  • One person in the room is not an octogenarian.

  • No one in the room is an octogenarian.

  • All those who are in the room are octogenarians.

  • Some people in the room are not octogenarians

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

No one in the room is an octogenarian.

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

The following question has two statements P and Q. They may look factually absurd. You have to ignore this absurdly and concentrate only upon the logic involved in its statement.
Mark the answer as
 P:  Some musicians are not rich. All musicians are polite. Therefore not all polite persons are rich. 
Q:  All musicians are rich. No rich person is polite. Therefore musicians are not polite. 


The words in the bottom row are related in the same way as the words in the top row. Fill in the blank. 

If Ocean: Waves, then Desert: —————— 


Instructions for Question:  

The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement. 

Main statement: Only if the teaching standard is destroyed, will the examination result be poor.   

1. The examination result is poor.
2. The teaching standard is not destroyed.
3. Examination result is not poor.
4. The teaching standard is destroyed.

The ordered pair of statements is: 


Find the odd one out from the following:


Choose the most appropriate option for the following question.

Crumb: Bread is as


Rahul Dravid, the head coach of India’s Under-19 cricket team, explained that the 2018 Under-19 World Cup team selection strategy was about providing opportunities to a lot more players to come into the India Under-19 fold. He explained that more than winning — which is not the right touchstone of success of a program at this level — what matters is how many of the players are able to move to the next level, which is playing first-class cricket. He, therefore, made a conscious decision to not select players from the previous World Cup to the 2018 Under-19 World Cup squad. 

Which one of the following statements is consistent with Dravid’s selection strategy for the 2018 Under-19 World Cup as stated above? 


Read the following information carefully and answer the question given below.
Seven film buffs - Aamna, Archana, Aradhana, Anu, Aahana, Anuja, and Aashna - attend a showing of classic movies. Three films are shown, one directed by Satyajit Ray, one by Stanley Kubrick, and one by Steven Spielberg. Each of the film buff see only one of the three films. The films are shown only once, one film at a time.
The following restrictions must apply:

  1. Exactly twice as many of the film buffs see the Stanley Kubrick film as the Satyajit Ray film.
  2. Aamna and Aahana do not see the same film as each other.
  3. Archana and Anu do not see the same film as each other.
  4. Anuja and Aashna see the same film as each other.
  5. Aradhana sees the Stanley Kubrick film.
  6. Aamna sees either the Satyajit Ray film or the Steven Spielberg film.

Which of the following must be true?


In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by four arguments numbered I, II, III, and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement

  • Should all the management institutes in the country be brought under government control?

Arguments

  1. No, the government does not have adequate resources to run such institutes effectively.
  2. No, each institute should be given the freedom to function on its own.
  3. Yes, this will enable to have standarised education for all the students.
  4. Yes, only then the quality of education would be improved.

In the following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and m. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements.

Statements

  1. Most of the 64 number of buses go to my office.
  2. This is the 64 number bus.

Conclusions

  1. This bus goes to my office.
  2. This bus does not go to my office.

The question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. The course of action is a step for administrative decisions to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the given suggested courses of action is/are logically worth pursuing.

Statement Despite the good economic progress of the country, the significant number of under-nourished cb.ildren has been observed in the rural parts of the country.

Courses of Action

I. The government should increase the Wealth Tax/ Income Tax and use that money for the upliftment of the deprived class.
II. The government should introduce schemes like free meals in primary schools and make primary education compulsory.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×