Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Choose the most appropriate option:
If it is false that 'There is at least one octogenarian in the room', then which one of the following is probable?
पर्याय
One person in the room is not an octogenarian.
No one in the room is an octogenarian.
All those who are in the room are octogenarians.
Some people in the room are not octogenarians
Advertisements
उत्तर
No one in the room is an octogenarian.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Read the following information for a question and chose the most appropriate option:
P and Q are good at driving the Motorcycle and Jeep. R and P are good at driving Jeep and Lorry. R, S, and T are good at driving Motor Cycle and Lorry. T and R are good at driving buses and Tempo. S and Q are good at driving Bus and Jeep.
Who is good at driving Tempo, Motor Cycle, Lorry but not Jeep?
Read the following information for a question and chose the most appropriate option:
P and Q are good at driving the Motorcycle and Jeep. R and P are good at driving Jeep and Lorry. R, S, and T are good at driving Motor Cycle and Lorry. T and R are good at driving buses and Tempo. S and Q are good at driving Bus and Jeep.
Who is good at driving all the vehicles?
The words in the bottom row are related in the same way as the words in the top row. Fill in the blank.
Rose, Flower, Plant
Flat, House, ………….
If 1 × 7 = 8, 2 × 7 = 16, 3 × 7 = 24, 4 × 7 = 32, then what is value of 9 × 7?
Instructions for Question:
The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
Main statement: The computer will not work if the operating system fails.
1. Operating system fails.
2. The operating system does not fail.
3. The computer does not work.
4. The computer works.
The ordered pair of statements is:
The question is based on a situation. Read the situation and answer the question that follows
Between 1960 and 1970, ivory poachers in the African nation of Zinbaku killed over 6,500 elephants. During that period, the total elephant population in Zinbaku fell from about 35,000 to just under 30,000. In 1970, new anti-poaching measures were implemented in Zinbaku, and between 1970 and 1980 over 800 poachers were arrested and expelled from the country. Nevertheless, by 1980, the elephant population in Zinbaku had fallen to about 21,000.
Which of the following, if true, would best help to explain the apparent paradox presented above?
Master : OCUVGT :: LABOUR : ?
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should coal engines be replaced by electric engines in trains?
Arguments
- Yes, coal engines cause a lot of pollution.
- No, India does not produce enough electricity to fulfill even the domestic needs.
Cuisine from the North of China is one of the most popular kinds of food in India. But this is not the case for Southern Chinese cuisine. In fact, in a recent survey, Southern Chinese cuisine was voted one of the least popular styles of cooking in the country.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox described above?
Vijay claimed that the large dent in the fender of the company-owned vehicle he had borrowed was caused by the careless actions of another motorist, who backed into the car when it was parked in a public garage. Yet Vijay's own car has several dents in its fenders, all of which he acknowledges as having caused by his own careless driving. Therefore, Vijay's contention that the dent in the formerly undented company-owned vehicle was caused by the careless actions of another person is not true.
The reasoning in this argument is vulnerable because of it
