English

Choose the Best Option that Correctly Classifies the Four Sentences as a : A. Everyday social life is impossible without interpersonal relationships.

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Choose the best option that correctly classifies the four sentences as a :

F: Fact: if it relates to a known matter of direct observation, or an existing reality or something known to be true
J: Judgment: If it is an opinion or estimate or anticipation of common sense or intention.
I: Inference: If it is a logical conclusion or deduction about something based:I on the knowledge of facts.

A. Everyday social life is impossible without interpersonal relationships.

B. The root of many misunderstandings has been cited in poor relations individuals.

C. Assuming the above to be true. social life will be much better if people understand the importance of good interpersonal relations.

D. A study reveals that interpersonal relations and hence life, in general, can be improved with a little effort on the part of individuals.

Options

  • FJIJ

  • JFIF

  • FIFJ

  • IFFJ

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

JFIF

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2014-2015 (May) Set 1

RELATED QUESTIONS

The following question has two statements P and Q. They may look factually absurd. You have to ignore this absurdly and concentrate only upon the logic involved in its statement.
Mark the answer as
 P: All fish can fly. Some fish are birds. All birds are naughty. Therefore some naughty can fly.
Q: Some fish are birds. All birds are naughty. Therefore all fish are naughty.


Read the following information for a question and chose the most appropriate option: 

P and Q are good at driving the Motorcycle and Jeep. R and P are good at driving Jeep and Lorry. R, S, and T are good at driving Motor Cycle and Lorry. T and R are good at driving buses and Tempo. S and Q are good at driving Bus and Jeep. 

Who is good at driving Tempo, Motor Cycle, Lorry but not Jeep? 


Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.

(i) Mohan‘s reading schedule consists of reading only subject on a given day of the week.  

(ii) The subjects are Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Biology, and Social Science.

(iii) Monday to Saturday are reading days including one day only for play. Sunday is a complete holiday for Mohan.  

(iv) Mathematics day is neither on the first day nor on the last day but earlier than the Chemistry day.

(v) Biology day is on the immediate next day of Chemistry day.

(vi) Physics day is on the immediate previous day of the play day. (vii) Biology day and Social Science day have a gap of two days between them.

(viii) Social Science day is on the immediate next day of the play day.

Which of the following day is the play day? 


Eye : Myopia :: Teeth : ?


The main statement is followed by four sentences. Select a pair of sentences that relate logically to the given statement.
If you go to China, You can find Chinese toys

  1. I didn't find Chinese toys.
  2. I found Chinese toys.
  3. I went to the fair.
  4. I didn't go to China.

Read the following information carefully and answer the question given below.
Seven film buffs -Aamna, Archana, Aradhana, Anu, Aahana, Anuja, and Aashna - attend a showing of classic movies. Three films are shown, one directed by Satyajit Ray, one by Stanley Kubrick, and one by Steven Spielberg. Each of the film buff see only one of the three films. The films are shown only once, one film at a time.
The following restrictions must apply:

  1. Exactly twice as many of the film buffs see the Stanley Kubrick film as the Satyajit Ray film.
  2. Aamna and Aahana do not see the same film as each other.
  3. Archana and Anu do not see the same film as each other.
  4. Anuja and Aashna see the same film as each other.
  5. Aradhana sees the Stanley Kubrick film.
  6. Aamna sees either the Satyajit Ray film or the Steven Spielberg film.

If exactly one film buff sees the Steven Spielberg film, then which one of the following must be true?


Given below is a passage followed by a statement about that passage. You must select one of the following answers:
Mediators recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold mediator - client confidentiality, however, there are situations that may occur where the mediator is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the mediator is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the mediator is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client; however, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.

Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to anti-national activities; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Mediation service providers and mediators practicing independently have their own boundaries but must agree with this contractually with their client at the outset of the client - counsel relationship.

If a mediator breaches his client's confidence about a serious issue without first informing their client of their intentions, they are breaking the law.

A growing number of ecologists have begun to recommend lifting the ban on the hunting of leopards, which are not an endangered species, and on the international trade of leopard's skin. Why, then, do I continue to support the protection of leopards?
For the same reason, I oppose the hunting of people. Admittedly, there are far too many human beings on this planet to qualify us for inclusion on the list of endangered species. Still, I doubt the same ecologists endorsing the resumption of leopard hunting would use that fact to recommend the hunting of human beings.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the author's argument?


In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement

  • The greatest need in India today is not for sophisticated gadgets but for programs that will provide employment to a large number of people.

Conclusions

  1. There is an adequate number of sophisticated gadgets in India.
  2. Emphasis is being laid on procuring sophisticated gadgets.

Examine the following statements

  1. None but the rich can afford to travel by air.
  2. Some of those who travel by air become sick.
  3. Some of those who become sick require treatment.

Which one of the following conclusions can be drawn from the above statements?


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×