Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Choose the best option that correctly classifies the four sentences as a :
F: Fact: if it relates to a known matter of direct observation, or an existing reality or something known to be true
J: Judgment: If it is an opinion or estimate or anticipation of common sense or intention.
I: Inference: If it is a logical conclusion or deduction about something based on the knowledge of facts.
A. The Cabinet minister definitely took the wrong step in giving the government contract.
B. Under the circumstances, he had many other alternatives.
C. The Prime Minister is embarrassed due to the minister's decision.
D. If he has put the government in jeopardy, the minister must resign.
Options
JFFI
IFJI
FFJI
IFIJ
Advertisements
Solution
JFFI
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
'Poverty is ... more restrictive and limiting than anything else. Its poverty and low standards continue then democracy, for all its fine institutions and ideals, ceases to be a liberating force. It must therefore aim continuously at the eradication of poverty and its companion unemployment. In other words, political democracy is not enough. It must develop into economic democracy also'.
Which of the following views, if true, would weaken the argument of the above passage?
Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
We are bombarded with misguided advertisements that give advice on healthy-eating, and this has had the effect of making food seem hugely complicated. People are demoralized because they are trying to follow this advice, yet they are getting fatter and fatter. For lots of people, food has become a minefield of dos and don’ts and a relaxed appreciation of the pleasures of eating has got a bit lost along the way. In fact, eating well is simple when you apply a few fundamental principles.
Which of the following proverbs is the closest in meaning to the central argument made in the passage?
Direction : Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
Since the book’s first publication in 1978, “Orientalism” has become one of those words that shuts down conversation on liberal campuses, where no one wants to be accused of being “Orientalist” any more than they want to be called racist, sexist, homophobic, or transphobic. That “Orientalist” is now a commonly applied epithet is a tribute to the power of Said’s account, but also to its vulgarization. With Orientalism, Said wanted to open a discussion about the way the Arab-Islamic world had been imagined by the West—not to prevent a clear-eyed reckoning with the region’s problems, of which he was all too painfully aware. He was also acutely aware of writing a work of history that was destined, like all such works, to become itself a historical document, refracting the pressures and anxieties of its moment.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a sped fie order Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.
A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.
B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.
C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increase carbon monoxide.
E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
In the question a statement is given followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Mark the answer as:
Statement: Should income tax be abolished?
Argument I: Yes, it is unnecessary burden on the wage earners.
Argument II: No, it is a good source of revenue.
The passage below is followed by a question based on it. Read the passage choose the best answer to the question.
Beautiful beaches attract people, no doubt about it. Just look at Goa's beautiful beaches, which are among the most overcrowded beaches in the country. Which of the following exhibits a pattern of reasoning most similar to the one exhibited in the argument above?
Four arguments are given. Each is a set of three sentences. Decide which set has third sentence as logical conclusion of first and second sentences considering the first two to be correct.
I. Some A are B. All B are C. Some A are C.
II. All men are yellow. No yellow are women. No men are women.
III. No ring is chain. Some chains are watches. Some rings are watches.
IV. Every P has a Q. All Q are R. No R has a P.
The question below contains a Statement and two Arguments I and II. Assume the statement to be true, choose the Argument which is strong using the Code below.
Statement: Should government jobs in rural areas have more incentives?
Arguments:
I. Yes. Incentives are essential for attracting government servants there.
II. No. Rural areas are already cheaper, healthier and less complex than big. So, why offer extra incentives!
‘Soft drinks have been shown by scientists to be bad for the teeth. Therefore, the government would be justified in banning all soft drinks from the Indian market. Assuming that the factual claim in the above argument is true, what else needs to be assumed for the conclusion to follow?
Information that is published is part of the public record. But information that a reporter collects, and sources that he contacts, must be protected in order for our free press to function free of fear. The above argument is most severely weakened by which one of the following statements?
