English

Write the dual statement of the following compound statement. Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu. - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.

One Line Answer
Advertisements

Solution

Radha or Sushmita cannot read Urdu.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.7 [Page 17]

APPEARS IN

RELATED QUESTIONS

Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :

(p ∨ q) →  r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


Show that the following statement pattern in contingency : 

(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)] 


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.


By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency.  (p →  q) ∧  (p ∧ ~ q ).


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)


Fill in the blanks :

Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.


Write the dual of the following:

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(p → r) ∧ q


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Write the dual of the following.

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q


Write the negation of the following statement:

(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)


If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×