Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Which is the right sentence?
Every time he spoke to the scientist, the writer felt guilty because
Options
he wasn’t sure what he wanted to ask.
he forced the scientist to use his voice synthesiser.
he was face to face with a legend.
Advertisements
Solution
Every time he spoke to the scientist, the writer felt guilty because he forced the scientist to use his voice synthesiser.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Had Hans Wolf ever been to Dorset? Why did he say he knew it?
Find in the poem the lines that mean the same as “Neither a borrower nor a lender be” (Shakespeare).
Say whether the following are true or false.
Meghna was saved by a relief helicopter.
What are the two different ideas about why so few animals were killed in the tsunami? Which idea do you find more believable?
Name these people
The person who recommended the introduction of English education in India.
Mention the following.
Two oppressive policies of the British.
Mention the following.
Four reasons for the discontent that led to the 1857 War of Independence.
Mention any three (or more) things that Parimal Ghose knew about Bepin Babu.
Write ‘True’ or ‘False’ against the following statement.
The Great Stone Face stood near where Ernest and his mother lived.
Why did Doc Wilson mean when he said, “Nothing in the world ever comes quite free”?
Answer the following question.
What general conclusion does the writer draw from this comparison?
Complete the following sentence.
It looks like a fashion display on the slopes when ________________________.
What was the story attributed to the Stone Face?
Velu stood on the platform but he felt “as if he was still on a moving train.” Why?
What made her advise him so?
How did the Maids of Honour come to know that the Princess and the bird had become intimate friends?
The new bird was full of new songs but the old parrots always repeated themselves. What did they say?
Who was the better swimmer? How do you know it?
Did he follow his advice? If not, why not?
His prayer to God is like a lawyer’s defence of a bad case. Does he argue his case well? What are the points he makes?
