Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
There are differences of opinion regarding the significance of both the Directive Principles and the Fundamental Rights. In this context explain the following:
What are the chief differences between the two?
Advertisements
Solution
Chief differences are as follow:
Directive Principles
- These are in Part IV of Constitution
- These are not justiciable
- These create certain privileges.
- These are directions to set objectives.
- Their aim is a Welfare State.
- These are related to a wide range including international peace.
Fundamental Rights
- These are in Part III of the Constitution.
- These are justiciable.
- These are existing privileges for citizens.
- These are certain restrictions on the state.
- Their aim is political democracy.
- These are related to the individual’s rights.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
What is the significance of the Right to Information granted by an Act enacted in 2005?
In the context of Fundamental Rights, give one example that India is a secular state.
To whom can the citizens of India file an application if they wish to seek any information from the government authorities?
How do the Fundamental Rights act as a check on the arbitrary conduct of the State?
What do we mean when we say that Fundamental Rights are justiciable?
OR
Rights are enforceable by the Courts. How?
Explain the scope of the following right:
Equality of opportunity in matters of Public Employment.
Why are the Fundamental Rights so called?
What are their characteristic features?
With reference to Fundamental Rights, answer the following:
How is the Right to Information an implied Fundamental Right?
In what respects do the Directive Principles differ from the Fundamental Rights?
