Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
The Montague-Chelmsford scheme of Constitutional Reforms was embodied in the Government of India Act, 1919. In this context discuss the main features of the Act of 1919?
Answer in Brief
Advertisements
Solution
- Dyarchy of Dual Government in the Provinces: Under the Dyarchy the subjects to be dealt by the Provincial Government were divided into:
(i) Reserved subjects, (ii) Transferred subjects. Central Government got subjects of national importance whereas Provincial Government got subjects of local importance. - Enlargement of Provincial Legislative Councils: The Act provided for the establishment of a Legislative Council consisting of the members of the Executive Council, and of nominated elected members.
- Powers of the Governor: The Governor was the head of the executive government in the province. He was supreme and enjoyed extensively legislative powers. He had the power to take over the entire administration in his hands in case of breakdown of Constitutional machinery.
- Supremacy of British Parliament: The Central Executive was not responsible to the Legislature but was responsible to the British Parliament.
- Voting Rights: Many Indians were granted the right to vote as the qualification for voting was lowered for Legislative Assembly. Women were also given the right to vote. The Act extended the communal franchise to other communities also.
shaalaa.com
Is there an error in this question or solution?
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
What was the importance of the Lucknow Pact of 1916?
Write any one major drawback of Lucknow Pact.
Who started the Home Rule Movement?
Give one main reason why the system of Dyarchy broke down.
Mention any two constitutional provisions of Lucknow Pact.
Why did the Indian National Congress support the British in the First World War?
What was the objective of the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms?
What were the two main terms of the Lucknow Pact.
What was the programme of the Home Rule League?
How did Tilak bring a new wave in Indian Politics that was distinct from the early congressmen?
