Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
The doctor is a person who looks after the sick people and prescribes medicines so that the patient recovers fast. In order to become a doctor, a person has to study medicine. Doctors lead a hard life. Their life is very busy. They get up early in the morning and go to the hospital. They work without taking a break. They always remain polite so that patients feel comfortable with them. Since doctors work so hard we must realise their value.
Based on the above paragraph, who among the following is/are doctor(s)?
i. Kumar Sharma wakes up early in the morning every day and treats everyone with patience. He usually gives emergency aid to the persons who are injured in accidents. ii. Rakesh studied medicine in Russia and practiced medicine there for 2 years. Later, stopped medical practice and turned into some business.
iii. Shalini works in Apollo Hospitals. She always remains polite so that patients feel comfortable. She is a specialist in providing quality care for cancer patients.
Options
All are doctors
Rakesh and Shalini are the doctors
Kumar Sharma and Rakesh are doctors
Only Rakesh is a doctor
Advertisements
Solution
Only Rakesh is a doctor
Explanation:
Of all the given options, only Rakesh has studied medicine and practised it.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
The question is based on a situation. Read the situation and answer the question that follows
Between 1960 and 1970, ivory poachers in the African nation of Zinbaku killed over 6,500 elephants. During that period, the total elephant population in Zinbaku fell from about 35,000 to just under 30,000. In 1970, new anti-poaching measures were implemented in Zinbaku, and between 1970 and 1980 over 800 poachers were arrested and expelled from the country. Nevertheless, by 1980, the elephant population in Zinbaku had fallen to about 21,000.
Which of the following, if true, would best help to explain the apparent paradox presented above?
If it is true that 'Religious fundamentalism is dangerous to the society', then which one of the following statements can also be true?
Solve the following question and mark the most appropriate option.
There were 200 students who gave a competitive exam. The exam had three sections English, Maths and General Knowledge(GK). Ten students could not pass in any of the subjects. Number of students passed in English was 125, Maths was 95 and general Knowledge was 95. 55 students passed in English and Mathematics. 45 students passed in GK and Maths and 60students passed in GK and English. 20 students passed in English and Maths but failed in GK.
How many passed in all three Subjects?
Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the question above that passage.
Most people feel that they are being confused by the information from the broadcast news. This could be the effect of the information's being delivered too quickly or of its being poorly organized. Analysis of the information content of a typical broadcast news story shows that news stories are far lower in information density than the maximum information density with which most people can cope at any one point of time. So, the information in typical broadcast news stories is poorly organised.
Which one of the following is an assumption that the argument requires in order for its conclusion to be properly drawn?
Political turmoil in a country is mainly caused by widespread violence and flawed economic policies of successive governments. If at all this has to be crushed, it can be achieved only by a dictatorial government which rules with iron hand. Therefore, the need of the hour is to elect a government which imposes fresh set of stringent legislations.
The alternatives suggested (not necessarily all), if true, significantly strengthen the argument. However, one of them is most forceful. Identify the same.
Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the question following the passage.
Cuisine from the north of China is one of the most popular kinds of food in India. But this is not the case for Southern Chinese cuisine. In fact, in a recent survey, Southern Chinese cuisine was voted one of the least popular styles of cooking in the country.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox described above?
In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?
Arguments
- No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
- Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
- Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.
The question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumption(s) is/are implicit in the statement.
Statement "Those who are appearing for this examination for the first time, should be helped in filling up the forms", an instruction to the invigilating staff.
Assumptions
- The form is somewhat complicated.
- Candidates can appear more than once for this examination.
In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement
- Sealed tenders are invited from competent contractors experienced in executing construction jobs.
Conclusions
- Tenders are invited only from experienced contractors.
- It is difficult to find competent tenders in construction jobs.
In the following question, a statement/group of statements is given followed by four conclusions. Choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statements.
Statement
- All the students in my class are intelligent.
- Rashmi is not intelligent.
