Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
How are popular struggles integral to the working democracy? Explain with an example of Bolivia's struggle against privatisation of water.
Advertisements
Solution
The importance of popular struggle in a democracy can be understood from the example of Bolivia's water war. People were dissatisfied with the decision of the government of giving up its control over municipal water supply and the subsequent hike in water tax imposed by the multinational corporation. This led to spontaneous popular protests as the water cost began to make a dent in the household budget of the people. An alliance of labour, human rights and community leaders organised a four day strike which was called off after the government agreed to negotiate. It was due to such protests by the people that the MNC contract was cancelled and the municipal water supply was restored to old rates.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Describe their public interest pressure groups functioning
Why did Mahatma Gandhi decide to call off the Civil Disobedience Movement? Explain.
Describe the popular struggle of Bolvia.
Who had designed the 'swaraj flag' by 1921?
Why did Mahatma Gandhi find in 'salt' a powerful symbol that could unite the nation? Explain.
How did the ‘Non-Cooperation Movement’ spread in cities across the country? Explain its effects on the economic front
Which one of the following was the main reason for Mahatma Gandhi to call off the Non-Cooperation movement in 1922?
(A) The Jallianwala Bagh incident
(B) Khilafat movement
(C) The passing of the Rowlatt Act
(D) The Chauri-Chaura incident
Explain with examples the role of industrialist in the freedom struggle of India.
Match List I with list II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the lists:
|
List I |
List II |
||
|
1. |
Pressure group |
Α. |
Narmada Bachao Andolan |
|
2. |
Long-term movement |
Β. |
Asom Gana Parishad |
|
3. |
Single issue movement |
C. |
Women’s Movement |
|
4. |
Political party |
D. |
Fertilizer dealers’ association |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
(a) |
D |
C |
A |
B |
|
(b) |
B |
A |
D |
C |
|
(c) |
C |
D |
B |
A |
|
(d) |
B |
D |
C |
A |
Mewat is one of the most backward areas in Haryana. It used to be a part of two districts, Gurgaon and Faridabad. The people of Mewat felt that the area will get better attention if it were to become a separate district. But political parties were indifferent to this sentiment. The demand for a separate district was raised by Mewat Educational and Social Organisation and Mewat Saksharta Samiti in 1996. Later, Mewat Vikas Sabha was founded in 2000 and carried out a series of public awareness campaigns. This forced both the major parties, Congress and the Indian National Lok Dal, to announce their support for the new district before the assembly elections held in February 2005. The new district came into existence in July 2005.
In this example what is the relationship that you observe among movement, political parties and the government? Can you think of an example that shows a relationship different from this one?
