English

Principle: Under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, an Employ Er is Liable to Pay Compensation to His Workmen for Injuries Sustained by Them by an Accident Arising Out of and in the

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

This question consists of principles and facts. The principal may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given hereinbelow for the question.  
Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability. 
Therefore, to answer a question, the principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option.

Principle: Under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, an employer is liable to pay compensation to his workmen for injuries sustained by them by an accident arising out of and in the course of employment.

Facts: M, the Manager of SRK Industries asked his secretary S to submit a report at the Government Labour Office. ‘S’ submitted the report as directed. On his way back S met one of his classmates. He then decided to have a cup of tea together at a wayside restaurant. Sometime later, ‘S’ got a message from his office to report back as it was a long time since he left the office. ‘S’ rushed back on his Motor Cycle. On his way back a Truck that was coming from a side road hit ‘S’. H e was admitted to a nearby hospital with multiple injuries. He claims compensation under the Employees Compensation Act from his employer.

Options

  • The Employer is liable as S had to rush back to the office, because of the message from the office. 

  • The Employer is not liable as the truck driver was negligent. 

  • The Employer is not liable as he was admitted to a  private hospital and not a Government Hospital.

  • The Employer is liable to pay compensation as the accident took place arising out of and in the course of employment. 

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

The Employer is liable to pay compensation as the accident took place arising out of and in the course of employment. 

Explanation:

The Employer is liable to pay the compensation as the accident took place arising out of and in the course of employment. 'S' had gone to the Government Labor Office to submit a report and after receiving a message to return back to the office, he suffered from an accident. This happened during the course of employment as he had gone to the Labor Office on the direction of the Manager and was returning back to SRK Industries. (Ramrao Zingraji Shende vs Indian Yarn Manufacturing 1994 ACJ 916, (1992) 94 BOMLR 596, 1992 (65) FLR 1055, (1993) ILLJ 442 Bom, 1993 (1) MhLj 23)

shaalaa.com
Study of Law (Entrance Exams)
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2016-2017 (May) Set 1

RELATED QUESTIONS

Principle: When, at the desire one person, any other person has done or abstained from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.

Facts:  X, the uncle of Y, made a promise to pay him an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- as a reward if Y quits smoking and drinking within one year. Y quit smoking and drinking within six months. 


The question consists of two statements, one labelled as a principle and other as Fact. You are to exa.mine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.

PRINCIPAL: ignorantia juris nonexcusat and ingnorantia facit excusat

FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Etombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the 'Manifest for transfer. On 28th Nov. 1962 Govemment of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that the gold must be declared in the "Manifest" of the aircraft.


Principles:

• A person is said to abet the doing of a thing when he instigates any other person to do that thing.

• Mere acquiescence, however, does not amount to instigation.

Facts: 'A' says to 'B': I am going to kill 'C'." And, 'B' replies: "Do as you wish and take the consequences"; whereafter 'A' kills 'C'.


Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Autrefois convict


Mark the best option:
The word "due process of law" indicates


Mark the best option:
To practice in a court


The following can be patented


In ‘quid-pro-quo’, quo stands for


Which of the following is not a category of copyright work in the CDPA?


Under which Act can action be taken against wilful defaulters of banking loans?


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×