Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
On the grounds of improving administrative efficiency, how Curzon justified the partition of Bengal.
Advertisements
Solution
Lord Curzon, who was the Viceroy of India from 1898 to 1905, became unpopular in India. The reason was that he had followed a policy against the Indians. He tried to justify the partition of Bengal by explaining that Bengal was too large as a province to be administrated by a single Governor. He, even in this dispatch, mentioned the view-points of Sir A. Fraser, Lt. Governor of Bengal. He said that the Presidency of Bengal had become large and unwieldy. It consisted of Bengal, Bihar, Orissa, Chhota Nagpur and some other far off areas. It extended over an area of about 4,89,500 sq. km. It had a huge population of about 7.8 million. The Royal assent was given on 18th September, 1905 to the proposals of Lord Curzon for the division of Bengal. According to this, the new province was created by amalgamating Assam and Chittagong with fifteen districts of old Bengal. The area of this new province was about 2,74,540 sq. km. and its population was about 31 million.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
State two reasons were given by Lord Curzon to justify the Partition of Bengal.
Mention one important anti-India policy adopted by Lord Curzon, which brought about aggressive nationalism in India.
Briefly state how people reacted to the partition of Bengal?
What was the main impact of the partition of Bengal on the national movement?
Which countries used the idea of Swadeshi and Boycott before it was used in the Indian National Movement?
Who was Anandamohan Bose? For what is he remembered?
How did Indians react to the call of Boycott and Swadeshi under Tilak’s leadership?
Give two examples to show how the Swadeshi Movement gave stimulus to native industries.
What was the reaction of the British Government to the Swadeshi and Boycott Movement?
Discuss how Curzon striked at the roots of Bengal nationalism to weaken the National Movement.
