English

Instructions for Question: the Following Question Has a Main Statement Followed by Four Statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the Ordered Pair of Statements Where

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Instructions for Question:  

The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement. 

Main statement: Either X or Y will take the only computer in the room. 

1. X took the computer. 
2. Y did not take the computer. 
3. X did not take the computer. 
4. Y took the computer. 

The ordered pair of statements is: 

Options

  • 3, 1 

  • 1, 3 

  • 4, 3 

  • 1, 2 

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

1, 2 

Explanation:

Two statement that follows main statement are 1 and 2. X took the computer and, Y did not take the computer.

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2018-2019 (May) Set 1

RELATED QUESTIONS

Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.

(i) Mohan‘s reading schedule consists of reading only subject on a given day of the week.  

(ii) The subjects are Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Biology, and Social Science.

(iii) Monday to Saturday are reading days including one day only for play. Sunday is a complete holiday for Mohan.  

(iv) Mathematics day is neither on the first day nor on the last day but earlier than the Chemistry day.

(v) Biology day is on the immediate next day of Chemistry day.

(vi) Physics day is on the immediate previous day of the play day. (vii) Biology day and Social Science day have a gap of two days between them.

(viii) Social Science day is on the immediate next day of the play day. 

Which day is Social Science day? 


Eye : Myopia :: Teeth : ?


NATION : ANTINO :: HUNGRY : ?


In the following questions find which one word cannot be formed from the letters of the given words using each letter only once:

IMPACTIENCE


Read the following information carefully and answer the question given below.
Seven film buffs -Aamna, Archana, Aradhana, Anu, Aahana, Anuja, and Aashna - attend a showing of classic movies. Three films are shown, one directed by Satyajit Ray, one by Stanley Kubrick, and one by Steven Spielberg. Each of the film buff see only one of the three films. The films are shown only once, one film at a time.
The following restrictions must apply:

  1. Exactly twice as many of the film buffs see the Stanley Kubrick film as the Satyajit Ray film.
  2. Aamna and Aahana do not see the same film as each other.
  3. Archana and Anu do not see the same film as each other.
  4. Anuja and Aashna see the same film as each other.
  5. Aradhana sees the Stanley Kubrick film.
  6. Aamna sees either the Satyajit Ray film or the Steven Spielberg film.

Which one of the following could be a complete and accurate list of the film buffs who do Not see the Stanley Kubrick film?


Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the question below that passage.
Modern science is built on the process of posing hypotheses and testing them against observations -in essence, attempting to show that the hypotheses are incorrect. Nothing brings more recognition than overthrowing conventional wisdom. It is accordingly not surprising that some scientists are skeptical of the widely accepted predictions of global warming. What is instead remarkable is that with hundreds of researchers striving to make breakthroughs in climatology, very few find evidence that global warming is unlikely.
The information above provides the most support for which one of the following statements? 


Read the following case and answer the question.

Sakshi is the Vice-President in an electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request "Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team. Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen's former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience. Lalit has described Kishen as too author it alive to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an ailing wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife. 

Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above

I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen to visit a family counsellor.

Which of the following would be the most appropriate sequence of decisions in terms of immediacy starting from immediate to a long term solution?


In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?

Arguments

  1. No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
  2. Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
  3. Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.

The question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumption(s) is/are implicit in the statement.

Statement The largest computer manufacturing company slashed the prices of most of the desktop models by about 15% with immediate effect.

Assumptions

  1. The company may incur heavy losses due to reduction in prices of the desktop.
  2. The sales of desktop manufactured by the company may increase in the near future.

In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement

  • Sealed tenders are invited from competent contractors experienced in executing construction jobs.

Conclusions

  1. Tenders are invited only from experienced contractors.
  2. It is difficult to find competent tenders in construction jobs.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×