English

Four Statements Are Given Below. Group Two of Them in Such a Way that One is Logically Incorrect and the Other is Verifiable as a Matter of Fact- - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Four statements are given below. Group two of them in such a way that one is logically incorrect and the other is verifiable as a matter of fact-

(a) The Sun does not rise in the East.
(b) A straight line is the shortest distance between any two points.
(c) Every circle has a center.
(d) The maximum duration of a total solar eclipse is about 7.5 minute.

Options

  • [a, c]

  • [c, d]

  • [a, d]

  • [a, b]

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

[a, d]

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

RELATED QUESTIONS

Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.

(i) Mohan‘s reading schedule consists of reading only subject on a given day of the week.  

(ii) The subjects are Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Biology, and Social Science.

(iii) Monday to Saturday are reading days including one day only for play. Sunday is a complete holiday for Mohan.  

(iv) Mathematics day is neither on the first day nor on the last day but earlier than the Chemistry day.

(v) Biology day is on the immediate next day of Chemistry day.

(vi) Physics day is on the immediate previous day of the play day. (vii) Biology day and Social Science day have a gap of two days between them.

(viii) Social Science day is on the immediate next day of the play day. 

Which of the following is the correct statement? 


Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H want to have dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements. 

(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.      
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D. 

During sitting: 


Instructions for Question:  

The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement. 

Main statement: Either X or Y will take the only computer in the room. 

1. X took the computer. 
2. Y did not take the computer. 
3. X did not take the computer. 
4. Y took the computer. 

The ordered pair of statements is: 


All men are chairs. John Doe is a man. In logical language, therefore: 


Who among the following is the odd one in the following group of persons?

Chief Justice of India, Attorney General of India, Solicitor General, Advocate General


Identify the statement which cannot be true


The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set, which gives the most logical triad. i.e. the third statement mentioned should be a conclusion drawn from the first two statements.

Statements:

  1. Some men are of short- height.
  2. Short-heighted men are intelligent.
  3. Sudhir is a man.
  4. Sudhir is of short-height.
  5. Sudhir is intelligent.
  6. AII men are intelligent.

In the following questions find which one word cannot be formed from the letters of the given words using each letter only once:

ORGANISATION


Read the following case and answer the question.

Sakshi is the Vice-President in an electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request "Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team. Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen's former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience. Lalit has described Kishen as to author it alive to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an ailing wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife. 

Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above

I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen visit a family counsellor.

Which of the following statements, if true would weaken the decision to sack Kishen the most?


In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by four arguments numbered I, II, Ill, and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement

  • Should people with educational qualifications higher than the optimum requirements be debarred from seeking jobs?

Arguments

  1. No, it will further aggravate the problem of educated unemployment.
  2. Yes, it creates complexes among employees and affects the work adversely.
  3. No, this goes against the basic rights of the individuals.
  4. Yes, this will increase productivity.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×