English

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency. (p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Questions

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)

Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

p q ~p ~q p∧~q ~p∧~q (p∧~q)→(~p∧~q)
T T F F F F T
T F F T T F F
F T T F F F T
F F T T F T T

The truth values in the last column are not identical.

Hence, it is contingency.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1.1: Mathematical Logic - Q.4

RELATED QUESTIONS

Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧  ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )


Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈  N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

p → (~ p ∨ q)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p ∧ q) → q


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table, verify.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Write the negation of the following statement.

All the stars are shining if it is night.


Write the negation of the following statement.

Some continuous functions are differentiable.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)


What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.


Write the dual of the following.

(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)


Write the dual of the following.

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q


Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.

Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.


The false statement in the following is ______.


Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.

“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”


Choose the correct alternative:

If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a


Choose the correct alternative:

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its


Write the dual of the following.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


Write the negation of the following statement:

(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:

(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)


The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.


Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×