English

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency: (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

p q ∼p ∼q

p ∧ q

∼p ∧ q p ∨ ∼q ∼p ∧ ∼q (I) ∨ (II) ∨ (III) ∨ (IV)
        (I) (II) (III) (IV)  
T T F F T F T F T
T F F T F F T F T
F T T F F T F F T
F F T T F F T T T

All the entries in the last column of the above truth table are T.
∴ (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q) is a tautology.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [Page 33]

APPEARS IN

Balbharati Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Arts and Science) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 7.6 | Page 33

Video TutorialsVIEW ALL [1]

RELATED QUESTIONS

Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.

"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "


Write the negation of the following statement : 
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.


Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."


Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)


Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.


Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]


Using the truth table, verify.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q.


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Write the dual of the following:

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Write the negation of the following statement.

∀ n ∈ N, n + 1 > 0


Write the negation of the following statement.

Some continuous functions are differentiable.


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.


The false statement in the following is ______.


Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.

“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”


Choose the correct alternative:

If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a


Choose the correct alternative:

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its


The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______


The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to ______. 


The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×