English

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency: [(p ∧ (p → q)] → q - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

p q p → q p ∧ (p → q) [p ∧ (p → q)] → q
T T T T T
T F F F T
F T T F T
F F T F T

All the entries in the last column of the above truth table are T.
∴ [(p ∧ (p → q)] → q is a tautology.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [Page 33]

APPEARS IN

Balbharati Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Arts and Science) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 7.5 | Page 33

Video TutorialsVIEW ALL [1]

RELATED QUESTIONS

Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.

"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "


Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧  ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )


Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1


Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈  N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

~ p → (p → ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Write the dual of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual of the following:

~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]


Write the negation of the following statement.

∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

~(p ∨ q) → r


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.

Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×