English

Consists of Legal Proposition(S)/ Principle(S) (Hereinafter Referred to as 'Principle') and Facts. Such Principles May Or May Not Be True in the Real and Legal Sense - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Consists of legal proposition(s)/  principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question.  
Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability, even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of the law.  
Therefore, to answer a question, the principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option. 

Principle: Contract is a written or spoken agreement, with specific terms between two or more persons or entities in which there is a promise to do something in return for a valuable benefit known as consideration. Such an agreement is intended to be enforceable by law. A unilateral contract is one in which there is a promise to pay or give other consideration in return for actual performance.

Facts: A Toilet Soap Manufacturing Company in India in order to promote the sale of their product, published an advertisement in all the Newspapers on January 1, 2017, that the Company has kept a model ignition key of an Audi A3 Car. The advertisement also stated that whoever gets the said key before December 31, 2017, from a soap bar will be gifted with the Audi A3 Car. Mr. Martin, a foreigner who came to India as a tourist who was staying in a Hotel found a Key similar to the same Car Ignition Key. Mr. Martin brought this matter to the notice of the Hotel Manager. The Manager informed Mr. Martin about the Company’s advertisement on January 1, 2017. Mr. Martin wants to claim the Car. Will he succeed?

Options

  • The Hotel Manager who could legally claim the Car as he was the one actually purchased the soap for the use in the Hotel.

  • No. The Soap Company has not entered into a contract with Mr. Martin as he was not in India on January 1,  2017, when the advertisement was published.

  • No. The Actual intention of the Company was to promote the sale of the Soap.

  • Mr. Martin obtained the Key before the stipulated date from the Soap Bar. So he is covered by the offer of the  Soap Company and can claim the car.  

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

Mr. Martin obtained the Key before the stipulated date from the Soap Bar. So he is covered by the offer of the  Soap Company and can claim the car.  

Explanation:

Mr. Martin obtained the Key before the stipulated date from the Soap Bar. So he is covered by the offer of the Soap Company and can claim the car. According to the advertisement (Contract) of the Soap Company, there was a promise for the gift of Audi A3 car in return of the model ignition key. Mr. Martin found the same model ignition key before the stipulated date. He can claim the car.

shaalaa.com
Indian Contract Act (Entrance Exams)
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2016-2017 (May) Set 1

RELATED QUESTIONS

Principle:  Property can be transferred only by a living person to another living person.  

Facts:  'A‘ transfers property of which he is the owner in favor of the unborn child of B.


The question consists of two statements, one labelled as principle and other as Fact. You are to exa.mine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.

PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person'S consent moves that property, such tatting is said to commit theft.

FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU'S ground, with the intention of dishonestly tatting the tree out of RINKU'S possession without RINKU'S consent. A could not take the tree away.


Consists of legal proposition(s)/  principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question.  
Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability, even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of the law.  
Therefore, to answer a question, the principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option. 

Principle: Every agreement, by which any party is restricted absolutely from enforcing his right in respect of any contract, by the usual legal proceedings in the ordinary Tribunals, is void to that extent. The law also provides that nobody can confer jurisdiction to a civil court by an agreement between parties.

Facts: A and B entered into a valid contract for rendering certain services. A clause in the contract was that in case of any dispute arose out of the contract; it shall be referred to for Arbitration only. Is the contract valid?


Drawing cash from ATM, sale by fall of the hammer at an auction sale, etc., are an example of


“A Contract is an agreement creating and defining obligations between the parties” the definition was put forwarded by


To form a valid contract, there should be at least .............


................. implies a contract though the parties never expressed their intention to enter into a contract.


The following question consists of two statements, one labelled as. 'Assertion' and the other as 'Reason'. Read both the statements carefully and answer using the codes given below.

Assertion (A): The parties to the contract must be competent to contract otherwise it will be a void contract.
Reason (R): All wagering agreements are void.


The speaker vote in the Lok Sabha is called


From the four answers given, Choose the appropriate answer.

All motor vehicles are required to have third party insurance. Any vehicle not using a mechanical device is not a motor vehicle.
Which of the following is a correct derivation from the above?


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×