Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Consider the following statements and choose the best option:
1. The Chairman of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) is the Chief justice of India.
2. Chief justice Mr. justice H L Dattu is the present Chairman of NALSA
3. The Chairman of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) is the senior-most Judge (after CJI) of the Supreme Court of I nd1a
4. Hon'ble Mr. Justice T. s. Thakur is the present Chairman of NALSA.
Options
1 and 2 are correct
2 and 3 are correct
3 and 4 are correct
None is correct
Advertisements
Solution
3 and 4 are correct
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
By which of the following date a person from Bangladesh is deemed to be an Indian citizen?
Which of the following committee was set-up by the Government of India on Indian Diaspora?
Which of the following have no guaranteed right to effective bargaining or right to strike?
Which of the following writ issued by the court to a public official asking him to perform his official duties that he has failed or refused to perform?
In the question given below are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). In the context of the two statements, which of the following is correct?
Assertion (A): The Council of Ministers in India collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.
Reason (R): The members of both the House of Parliament are eligible to be the members in Council of Ministers.
Who among the following administers the Oath and affirmation of the State Legislative Assembly?
Who among the following judges faced the impeachment process in the Lok Sabha?
In the question given below are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). In the context of the two statements, which of the following is correct?
Assertion (A): The Indian Constitution recognises the supremacy of the judiciary.
Reason (R): The question as to what constitutes a reasonable restriction on Fundamental Rights is to be determined by the Court of Law.
Who amongest the following was not a Chief Justice of India?
On April 2013, the Supreme Court held that the modification of a well-known cancer-fighting drug is not a patentable new invention against which pharmaceutical firm?
