Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Consider the following sets of quantum numbers:
| n | l | m | s | |
| (i) | 3 | 0 | 0 | `+1/2` |
| (ii) | 2 | 2 | 1 | `-1/2` |
| (iii) | 4 | 3 | –2 | `+1/2` |
| (iv) | 1 | 0 | –1 | `+1/2` |
| (v) | 3 | 4 | 3 | `-1/2` |
Which of the following sets of quantum number is not possible?
Options
(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv)
(ii), (iv) and (v)
(i) and (iii)
(ii), (iii) and (iv)
Advertisements
Solution
(ii), (iv) and (v)
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
The energy of light of wavelength 45 nm is
Based on equation E = `-2.178 xx 10^(-18) "J" ("z"^2/"n"^2)`, certain conclusions are written. Which of them is not correct?
Which of the following pairs of d-orbitals will have electron density along the axes?
Two electrons occupying the same orbital are distinguished by __________.
Assertion: Number of radial and angular nodes for 3p orbital are 1, 1 respectively.
Reason: Number of radial and angular nodes depends only on principal quantum number.
The total number of orbitals associated with the principal quantum number n = 3 is
Electron density in the yz plane of 3dxy orbital is
Which quantum number reveal information about the shape, energy, orientation and size of orbitals?
How many radial nodes for 2s, 4p, 5d and 4f orbitals exhibit? How many angular nodes?
The stabilisation of a half-filled d-orbital is more pronounced than that of the p-orbital why?
