English

Choose the Pair of Words from the Options that Best Represents a Similar Relationship as the One Expressed in the Following Pair of Words.

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Choose the pair of words from the options that best represents a similar relationship as the one expressed in the following pair of words.

Waiter: Restaurant

Options

  • Driver : Car

  • Teacher : School

  • Author : Book

  • Actor : Acting

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

Teacher: School

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

RELATED QUESTIONS

Choose the most appropriate option for the following question.

Crumb: Bread is as


Find the odd one out


Solve the following question and mark the most appropriate option.
In a family of six, there are three men A, B, and C, and three women R, S, and T. The six persons are Architect, Lawyer, CA, Professor, Doctor, and an Engineer by profession but not in the same order. There are two married couples and two unmarried persons. C is not R's husband. The Doctor is married to a Lawyer. R's grandfather is a Professor. Bis neither A's son nor he is an Architect or a Professor. The Lawyer is T's daughter-in-law. C is T's son and the Engineer's father. A is married to the CA.
Which among the following is the correct pair of married couples?


Melt : Liquid :: Freeze : ?


Given below is a passage followed by a statement about that passage. You must select one of the following answers:
Mediators recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold mediator - client confidentiality, however, there are situations that may occur where the mediator is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the mediator is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the mediator is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client; however, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.
Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to anti-national activities; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Mediation service providers and mediators practicing independently have their own boundaries but must agree with this contractually with their client at the outset of the client - counsel relationship.
Mediators have some flexibility regarding what they deem serious enough to lead them to breach confidentiality.

Read the following case and answer the question.

Sakshi is the Vice-President in an electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request "Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team. Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen's former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience. Lalit has described Kishen as to author it alive to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an ailing wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife. 

Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above

I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen visit a family counsellor.

Which of the following statements, if true would weaken the decision to sack Kishen the most?


The question has a main statement followed by four statements labelled I, II, III, and IV. Choose the ordered pair of statements, where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.

Whether Amir is angry, or he shows mock anger.  

I. Amir shows mock anger.   
II. Amir is angry.   
III. Amir does not show mock anger.   
IV. Amir is not angry.   


In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?

Arguments

  1. No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
  2. Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
  3. Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.

In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by four arguments numbered I, II, III, and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement

  • Should all the management institutes in the country be brought under government control?

Arguments

  1. No, the government does not have adequate resources to run such institutes effectively.
  2. No, each institute should be given the freedom to function on its own.
  3. Yes, this will enable to have standarised education for all the students.
  4. Yes, only then the quality of education would be improved.

The question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumption(s) is/are implicit in the statement.

Statement The school authority decided to rent out the school premises during weekends and holidays for organizing various functions to augment its resources.

Assumptions

  1. The parents of the school students may protest against the decision of the school authority.
  2. There may not be enough demand for hiring the school premises for organizing functions.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×