Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Anti-Partition Agitation of 1905 was essentially aimed at undoing the Partition of Bengal. In this context what limitations did the agitation suffer?
Advertisements
Solution
The Anti-Partition Agitation suffered from many limitations which are often described as causes of the failure of the Movement. First of all the agitationists though spoke about overthrowing the British, they had no plan to provide any alternative Government in India. The Swadeshi and Boycott Movement focused only on economic aspects of the programme. It was not used as a political weapon to destabilise the Government. It had the potential of causing such a Revolution but nothing of that sort was done. Even the Congress remained a divided house between the Moderates and Assertives and the doors had finally to be closed to the Assertives at the Surat session of the Congress in 1907. These limitations however don’t undermine the significance of the Anti-Partition Movement.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
State two reasons were given by Lord Curzon to justify the Partition of Bengal.
What was the General Service Enlistment Act?
What were Curzon’s two real motives behind the partition of Bengal.
How did the ideas of Swadeshi help Indians to be united against the British?
Discuss how Curzon striked at the roots of Bengal nationalism to weaken the National Movement.
How did the Nationalists interpret Lord Curzon’s motives?
Discuss about the measures taken by the British to crush the Anti-Partition Movement.
“Anti-Partition movement roused the national sentiments which led to the outbusst of revolutionary activity”. Discuss in brief.
What measure did Lord Curzon take to reduce the ‘influence of Bengal’?
What justification did Lord Curzon give to the Indians for the Partition of Bengal?
