English

All good hockey players are in the Indian hockey team. 'X' is not a good hockey player.

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Two statements are given below followed by two conclusions (I and II). You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the conclusions if any follow from the given statements.

Statements:
All good hockey players are in the Indian hockey team. 'X' is not a good hockey player.

Conclusions: 
I. 'X' is not in the Indian Hockey team.
II. 'X' wants to be in the Indian Hockey team.

Options

  • Only I follows

  • Only II follows

  • Both I and II follow

  • Neither I nor II follows

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

Neither I nor II follows

Explanation:

Neither of the two conclusions follows ‘X’ may or may not be inside the outer circle

(representing people in the Indian Hockey team)

G: Good Hockey Players
IH: People in Indian Hockey Team.

shaalaa.com
Syllogism and Critical Reasoning (Entrance Exam)
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×