Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Solve the following problem :
The percentage of girls’ enrollment in total enrollment for years 1960-2005 is shown in the following table.
| Year | 1960 | 1965 | 1970 | 1975 | 1980 | 1985 | 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 |
| Percentage | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 10 |
Fit a trend line to the above data by graphical method.
Advertisements
उत्तर
Taking year on X-axis and percentage of enrolment on Y-axis, we plot the points for enrolment corresponding to years. Joining these points, we get the graph of time series. We fit the trend line as shown in the following graph.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Obtain the trend values for the data in using 4-yearly centered moving averages.
| Year | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 |
| Index | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
Obtain the trend values for the above data using 3-yearly moving averages.
The following table shows the production of gasoline in U.S.A. for the years 1962 to 1976.
| Year | 1962 | 1963 | 1964 | 1965 | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | 1969 | 1970 | 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 |
| Production (Million Barrels) |
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
i. Obtain trend values for the above data using 5-yearly moving averages.
ii. Plot the original time series and trend values obtained above on the same graph.
Choose the correct alternative :
What is a disadvantage of the graphical method of determining a trend line?
The simplest method of measuring trend of time series is ______.
Fill in the blank :
The complicated but efficient method of measuring trend of time series is _______.
State whether the following is True or False :
Moving average method of finding trend is very complicated and involves several calculations.
State whether the following is True or False :
Least squares method of finding trend is very simple and does not involve any calculations.
Solve the following problem :
The following table shows the production of pig-iron and ferro- alloys (‘000 metric tonnes)
| Year | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 |
| Production | 0 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
Fit a trend line to the above data by graphical method.
Solve the following problem :
Following table shows the amount of sugar production (in lac tonnes) for the years 1971 to 1982.
| Year | 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 |
| Production | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
Fit a trend line to the above data by graphical method.
Solve the following problem :
Fit a trend line to data in Problem 4 by the method of least squares.
Solve the following problem :
Fit a trend line to the data in Problem 7 by the method of least squares.
Solve the following problem :
Following table shows the number of traffic fatalities (in a state) resulting from drunken driving for years 1975 to 1983.
| Year | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 |
| No. of deaths | 0 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
Fit a trend line to the above data by graphical method.
Obtain trend values for data in Problem 19 using 3-yearly moving averages.
Choose the correct alternative:
Moving averages are useful in identifying ______.
The complicated but efficient method of measuring trend of time series is ______
The method of measuring trend of time series using only averages is ______
State whether the following statement is True or False:
The secular trend component of time series represents irregular variations
State whether the following statement is True or False:
Least squares method of finding trend is very simple and does not involve any calculations
Following table shows the amount of sugar production (in lac tons) for the years 1971 to 1982
| Year | 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 |
| Production | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Year | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 |
| Production | 4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
Fit a trend line by the method of least squares
The following table gives the production of steel (in millions of tons) for years 1976 to 1986.
| Year | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 |
| Production | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 10 |
Obtain the trend value for the year 1990
Use the method of least squares to fit a trend line to the data given below. Also, obtain the trend value for the year 1975.
| Year | 1962 | 1963 | 1964 | 1965 | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | 1969 |
| Production (million barrels) |
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Year | 1970 | 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | |
| Production (million barrels) |
6 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
The following table shows the production of gasoline in U.S.A. for the years 1962 to 1976.
| Year | 1962 | 1963 | 1964 | 1965 | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | 1969 |
| Production (million barrels) |
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Year | 1970 | 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | |
| Production (million barrels) |
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
- Obtain trend values for the above data using 5-yearly moving averages.
- Plot the original time series and trend values obtained above on the same graph.
Following table shows the all India infant mortality rates (per ‘000) for years 1980 to 2010
| Year | 1980 | 1985 | 1990 | 1995 |
| IMR | 10 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Year | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | |
| IMR | 3 | 1 | 0 |
Fit a trend line by the method of least squares
Solution: Let us fit equation of trend line for above data.
Let the equation of trend line be y = a + bx .....(i)
Here n = 7(odd), middle year is `square` and h = 5
| Year | IMR (y) | x | x2 | x.y |
| 1980 | 10 | – 3 | 9 | – 30 |
| 1985 | 7 | – 2 | 4 | – 14 |
| 1990 | 5 | – 1 | 1 | – 5 |
| 1995 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 2005 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| 2010 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 0 | 28 | – 44 |
The normal equations are
Σy = na + bΣx
As, Σx = 0, a = `square`
Also, Σxy = aΣx + bΣx2
As, Σx = 0, b =`square`
∴ The equation of trend line is y = `square`
Obtain trend values for data, using 3-yearly moving averages
Solution:
| Year | IMR | 3 yearly moving total |
3-yearly moving average (trend value) |
| 1980 | 10 | – | – |
| 1985 | 7 | `square` | 7.33 |
| 1990 | 5 | 16 | `square` |
| 1995 | 4 | 12 | 4 |
| 2000 | 3 | 8 | `square` |
| 2005 | 1 | `square` | 1.33 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | – |
Complete the table using 4 yearly moving average method.
| Year | Production | 4 yearly moving total |
4 yearly centered total |
4 yearly centered moving average (trend values) |
| 2006 | 19 | – | – | |
| `square` | ||||
| 2007 | 20 | – | `square` | |
| 72 | ||||
| 2008 | 17 | 142 | 17.75 | |
| 70 | ||||
| 2009 | 16 | `square` | 17 | |
| `square` | ||||
| 2010 | 17 | 133 | `square` | |
| 67 | ||||
| 2011 | 16 | `square` | `square` | |
| `square` | ||||
| 2012 | 18 | 140 | 17.5 | |
| 72 | ||||
| 2013 | 17 | 147 | 18.375 | |
| 75 | ||||
| 2014 | 21 | – | – | |
| – | ||||
| 2015 | 19 | – | – |
The following table shows gross capital information (in Crore ₹) for years 1966 to 1975:
| Years | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | 1969 | 1970 |
| Gross Capital information | 20 | 25 | 25 | 30 | 35 |
| Years | 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 |
| Gross Capital information | 30 | 45 | 40 | 55 | 65 |
Obtain trend values using 5-yearly moving values.
