हिंदी

Who is a Teacher?

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Read the following information carefully and choose the appropriate option in the questions given below:

i. There is a group of five persons – A, B, C, D and E.

ii. One of them is a Singer, one is a Dancer, one is a Painter, one is a teacher and one is a Doctor.

iii. Three of them – A, C and Doctor prefer rice to chapatti and two of them – B and the Painter prefer chapatti to rice.

iv. The Teacher, D and A are friends to one another but two of these prefer chapatti to rice.

v. The Singer is C’s brother.

Who is a Teacher?

विकल्प

  • C

  • E

  • D

  • B

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

B

Explanation:

Person Profession Preference
A Singer Rice to Chapatti
B Teacher Chapatti to rice
C Dancer Rice ti Chapati
D Painter Chapatti to Rice
E Doctor Rice to Chapatti

B is a Teacher.  

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2016-2017 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

The following question has two statements P and Q. They may look factually absurd. You have to ignore this absurdly and concentrate only upon the logic involved in its statement.
Mark the answer as
 P:  Some musicians are not rich. All musicians are polite. Therefore not all polite persons are rich. 
Q:  All musicians are rich. No rich person is polite. Therefore musicians are not polite. 


The words in the bottom row are related in the same way as the words in the top row. Fill in the blank. 

Rose, Flower, Plant

Flat, House, …………. 


Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H want to have dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements. 

(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.      
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D. 

H will be sitting between: 


If it is true that 'Good governance implies law and order in society' then identify the statement which has to be accepted along with the given statement?


In a bag, there are some diamonds. In another bag, there is one fourth the number more than the number of diamonds in the first bag. If the difference in the number of diamonds in the first and second bag is 3, how many diamonds are there in the first bag?


Choose the most appropriate option:

If it is false that 'There is at least one octogenarian in the room', then which one of the following is probable? 


Choose the most appropriate option for the following question.

wave: crest as _________ : peak.


Read the information given below and answer the question that follows.
The faces of a cube are painted in different colors. Blackface is opposite to red. Whiteface is between black and red. Green face is adjacent to grey and blue face is adjacent to green. What colour will be on the face opposite to the white face of the cube?


In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?

Arguments

  1. No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
  2. Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
  3. Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.

In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement

  • The majority of Indian labourers belong to the unorganised sector and most of them earn very low.

Conclusions

  1. The labourers belonging to the organised sector have better benefits and stability.
  2. Some labourers belonging to the unorganised sector have a regular and certain income.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×