Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.
A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H want to have dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements.
(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D.
A and F will become neighbours if:
विकल्प
B agrees to change her sitting position
C agrees to change her sitting position
G agrees to change her sitting position
H agrees to change her sitting position
Advertisements
उत्तर
H agrees to change her sitting position
Explanation:
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Instructions for Question: Choose the set of three statements where the third statement can be logically derived from the preceding two.
Statements:
1. All boys need books.
2. All the girls need books.
3. Punjabis are a girl.
4. Some Punjabis need the book.
5. All the boys are girls.
6. Some boys are Punjabis.
The set of statements is:
Instructions for Question:
The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
Main statement: Only if the teaching standard is destroyed, will the examination result be poor.
1. The examination result is poor.
2. The teaching standard is not destroyed.
3. Examination result is not poor.
4. The teaching standard is destroyed.
The ordered pair of statements is:
Find the odd one out from the following:
The question has a main statement followed by four statements labelled I, II, III, and IV. Choose the ordered pair of statements, where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
Every player will become a champ.
A. Rajesh is a player.
B. Rajesh will become champ.
C. Rajesh is not a player.
D. Rajesh will not become a champ.
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should all the factories in the cities be shifted to the outskirts, far away from the main city?
Arguments
- Yes, this is an essential Step for controlling pollution in the city.
- No, such a Step will lead to a lot of inconveniences to the employees of the factories and their families as well.
In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?
Arguments
- No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
- Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
- Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.
Psychological novels are superior to novels of adventure. Immature readers prefer novels of adventure to novels with less action and greater psychological depth. The immature reader: who prefers James Bond's exploits to the subtleties of Henry James, can be identified easily by his choice of inferior reading matter.
A criticism of the logic of this argument would be likely to find fault with the author's.
Some people fear that our first extra-terrestrial visitors will not be the friendly aliens envisaged in popular science fiction movies, but rather hostile invaders bent on global domination. This fear is groundless. Any alien civilization that makes it to our planet must have acquired the wisdom to control war, or it would have destroyed itself long before contacting us.
The author bases the argument above on which of the following assumptions?
In the following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and m. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements.
Statements
- Water has the shape, has volume.
- The knowledge is like water, flowing from one side to other.
Conclusions
- Knowledge is interdisciplinary.
- The knowledge is bound within a specific area.
- Knowledge influences the core of mental activity directly.
The question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. The course of action is a step for administrative decisions to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the given suggested courses of action is/are logically worth pursuing.
Statement The committee has criticised the institute for its failure to implement a dozen regular programs despite an increase in the staff strength and not drawing up a firm action plan for studies and researches.
Courses of Action
I. The broad objectives of the institute should be redefined to implement a practical action plan.
II. The institute should give a report on reasons for not having implemented the planned programs.
