Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Instructions for Question:
The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
Main statement: Only if the teaching standard is destroyed, will the examination result be poor.
1. The examination result is poor.
2. The teaching standard is not destroyed.
3. Examination result is not poor.
4. The teaching standard is destroyed.
The ordered pair of statements is:
विकल्प
2, 3
2, 4
1, 3
1, 2
Advertisements
उत्तर
2, 3
Explanation:
Two statements which logically follow main statements are: Teaching standard is not destroyed and examination result is not poor.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Geeta is taller than Seeta, but not taller than Radha. Radha and Rani are of same height. Geeta is shorter than Paru. Amongst all girls who is the shortest?
Instructions for Question:
The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
Main statement: Either X or Y will take the only computer in the room.
1. X took the computer.
2. Y did not take the computer.
3. X did not take the computer.
4. Y took the computer.
The ordered pair of statements is:
Answer the question based on the information given.
"Some men are certainly intelligent, others are certainly not intelligent, but of intermediate men, we should say, 'intelligent'? Yes, I think, so or no, I shouldn't be inclined to call him intelligent."
Which of the following most accurately reflects the intention of the writer of the above?
Who among the following is the odd one in the following group of persons?
Chief Justice of India, Attorney General of India, Solicitor General, Advocate General
Flow : River :: Stagnant : ?
The question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.
Statement Many species of animals on our earth are still not studied scientifically and if we do not do this work urgently, many species will face extinction.
Assumptions
- Earth may lose all types of life very shortly.
- It is desirable and possible to study scientifically many animal species.
The following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and III. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements
Statements
- Education is a process of lighting.
- The mind requires light to enlighten the core of the cognitive aspect.
Conclusions
- Education is a light that removes the darkness of the mind.
- Education is a static process for the mind.
The question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. The course of action is a step for administrative the decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the given suggested courses of action is/are logically worth pursuing.
Statement The cream of India's Cricket team is likely to retire in the next three years leaving a vacuum that the Indian Cricket team is going to struggle to overcome.
Course of Action
- The BCCI should start to induct youngsters into the team and start to give them exposure to pressure situations.
-
There should be a rotation policy adopted for senior players in order to prolong their careers and keep them injury-free.
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should there be a total ban on the use of plastic bags?
Arguments
- No. instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.
- Yes, the use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and waterlogging, and hence, it is necessary to ban it.
In the following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and m. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements.
Statements
- Water has the shape, has volume.
- The knowledge is like water, flowing from one side to other.
Conclusions
- Knowledge is interdisciplinary.
- The knowledge is bound within a specific area.
- Knowledge influences the core of mental activity directly.
