हिंदी

Instructions for Question: the Following Question Has a Main Statement Followed by Four Statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the Ordered Pair of Statements Where the First Statement Implies the Second

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Instructions for Question:  

The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement. 

Main statement: The computer will not work if the operating system fails.

1. Operating system fails.
2. The operating system does not fail.
3. The computer does not work.
4. The computer works.

The ordered pair of statements is: 

विकल्प

  • 2, 1 

  • 2, 3 

  • 1, 4 

  • 4, 2 

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

4, 2 

Explanation:

Two statements that follows main statement are 4 and 2. The computer works and, Operation system does not fail.

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2018-2019 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

If it is true that 'Good governance implies law and order in society' then identify the statement which has to be accepted along with the given statement?


Identify the statement which cannot be true


The doctor is a person who looks after the sick people and prescribes medicines so that the patient recovers fast. In order to become a doctor, a person has to study medicine. Doctors lead a hard life. Their life is very busy. They get up early in the morning and go to the hospital. They work without taking a break. They always remain polite so that patients feel comfortable with them. Since doctors work so hard we must realise their value.

Based on the above paragraph, who among the following is/are doctor(s)?

i. Kumar Sharma wakes up early in the morning every day and treats everyone with patience. He usually gives emergency aid to the persons who are injured in accidents. ii. Rakesh studied medicine in Russia and practiced medicine there for 2 years. Later, stopped medical practice and turned into some business.
iii. Shalini works in Apollo Hospitals. She always remains polite so that patients feel comfortable. She is a specialist in providing quality care for cancer patients.


A large volume of water is gushing through a pipe which narrows at the outlet. At which point, A, B, C or D will the water flow fastest?


In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement Should the salary and perquisites of the public sector undertaking employees be made equivalent to those in the private sector?

Arguments

  1. Yes, this will help the public sector undertaking to attract and retain a competent workforce.
  2. No, public sector undertakings cannot afford to pay salaries to the level of the private sector.
  3. Yes, otherwise the public sector undertakings will not be able to compete with the private sector organisations.

The following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and IIIYou have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements

Statements

  1. Science has brought gadgets of happiness, prosperity, and wealth.
  2. Science has not solved the problems of overpopulation.

Conclusions

  1. Overpopulation is due to unscientific thinking.
  2. Science has not helped world peace.

In the following question, a statement/group of statements is given followed by four conclusions. Choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statements.

Statement

  1. All the students in my class are intelligent.
  2. Rashmi is not intelligent.

In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement

  • Should there be a total ban on the use of plastic bags? 

Arguments

  1. No. instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.
  2. Yes, the use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and waterlogging, and hence, it is necessary to ban it.

In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and ill. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement

  • Should the salary and perquisites of public sector undertaking employees be made equivalent to those in the private sector?

Arguments

  1. Yes, this will help the public sector undertaking to attract and retain a competent workforce.
  2. No, public sector undertakings cannot afford to pay salaries to the level of the private sector.
  3. Yes, otherwise the public sector undertakings will not be able to compete with the private sector organisations.

The question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. The course of action is a step for administrative decisions to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the given suggested courses of action is/are logically worth pursuing.

Statement The expert's group on technical education has stressed that computer education should be provided to children from the primary school itself. It should be implemented in urban and rural schools, simultaneously.

Courses of Action

I. The government should issue instructions to all schools for computer education.
II. At least one teacher from each school should be trained in computer operations for teaching children.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×