Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.
A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H want to have dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements.
(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D.
H will be sitting between:
विकल्प
C and B
A and F
D and C
E and G
Advertisements
उत्तर
A and F
Explanation:
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The following question has two statements P and Q. They may look factually absurd. You have to ignore this absurdly and concentrate only upon the logic involved in its statement.
Mark the answer as
P: Jackals live in forests. Cities are in forests. Therefore jackals live in cities.
Q: Some tables are grass. All stools are grass. Therefore all tables are stools.
Answer the question based on the information given.
A highly cohesive workgroup is a prerequisite for high team performance. Sociologists point out that the association between group cohesion and success is owing to the support individual team members give to one another and their acceptance of the group's goals and activities.
Each of the following, if true, either provides support for or cannot weaken the sociologists' assumption about the relationship between cohesion and success EXCEPT
The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set, which gives the most logical triad. i.e. the third statement mentioned should be a conclusion drawn from the first two statements.
Statements:
- Some men are of short- height.
- Short-heighted men are intelligent.
- Sudhir is a man.
- Sudhir is of short-height.
- Sudhir is intelligent.
- AII men are intelligent.
Read the following information carefully and choose the appropriate option in the questions given below:
i. There is a group of five persons – A, B, C, D and E.
ii. One of them is a Singer, one is a Dancer, one is a Painter, one is a teacher and one is a Doctor.
iii. Three of them – A, C and Doctor prefer rice to chapatti and two of them – B and the Painter prefer chapatti to rice.
iv. The Teacher, D and A are friends to one another but two of these prefer chapatti to rice.
v. The Singer is C’s brother.
Who is a Dancer?
Rahul Dravid, the head coach of India’s Under-19 cricket team, explained that the 2018 Under-19 World Cup team selection strategy was about providing opportunities to a lot more players to come into the India Under-19 fold. He explained that more than winning — which is not the right touchstone of success of a program at this level — what matters is how many of the players are able to move to the next level, which is playing first-class cricket. He, therefore, made a conscious decision to not select players from the previous World Cup to the 2018 Under-19 World Cup squad.
Which of the following statements, if true, contradicts Dravid’s selection strategy?
In the following questions find which one word cannot be formed from the letters of the given words using each letter only once:
MEASUREMENT
Cuisine from the North of China is one of the most popular kinds of food in India. But this is not the case for Southern Chinese cuisine. In fact, in a recent survey, Southern Chinese cuisine was voted one of the least popular styles of cooking in the country.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox described above?
Information that is published is part of the public record. But the information that a reporter collects, and sources that he contacts, must be protected in order for our free press to function free of fear.
The above argument is most severely weakened by which one of the following statements?
A growing number of ecologists have begun to recommend lifting the ban on the hunting of leopards, which are not an endangered species, and on the international trade of leopard's skin. Why, then, do I continue to support the protection of leopards?
For the same reason, I oppose the hunting of people. Admittedly, there are far too many human beings on this planet to qualify us for inclusion on the list of endangered species. Still, I doubt the same ecologists endorsing the resumption of leopard hunting would use that fact to recommend the hunting of human beings.
Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the author's argument?
The question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. The course of action is a step for administrative decisions to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the given suggested courses of action is/are logically worth pursuing.
Statement Despite the good economic progress of the country, the significant number of under-nourished cb.ildren has been observed in the rural parts of the country.
Courses of Action
I. The government should increase the Wealth Tax/ Income Tax and use that money for the upliftment of the deprived class.
II. The government should introduce schemes like free meals in primary schools and make primary education compulsory.
