English

UG-CLAT entrance exam Question Bank Solutions for Legal Reasoning

Advertisements
[object Object]
[object Object]
Subjects
Popular subjects
Topics
Advertisements
Advertisements
Legal Reasoning
< prev  361 to 380 of 1023  next > 

Legal Principle: A person who keeps hazardous substances in his premises, is responsible for the fault if that substance escapes in any manner and causes damage.

Facts: A, an industrialist stored 1000 litres of liquid ammonia in a tank in his premises for his industrial use. There was a leakage from the tank due to which there was ammonia vapour in the surroundings. Many workers in other industries, as well as his own industry and some members from the public, suffered serious health hazards. Examine the liability of A, if any.

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

The law relating to prisoners of war has been codified by

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Advertisements

Who among the following was the first Chief Information Commissioner of India?

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Muslim religious foundations are known as

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Torts is a ________

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Injuria sine damnum stands for.

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Unliquidated damage stands for

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Consent defines as

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Defamation means

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Qui facit per alium facit per se stands for

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Public nuisance include

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

The defence under nuisance is

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

PRINCIPLE Where the plaintiff himself is in fault, the defendant shall not be answerable for the harm brought on by the plaintiff's own actions.

FACTS Jimmy had put up a board in his house warning all trespassers of ‘Beware of Dogs’. Jimmy arrived home using a cab and since he did not have the wallet asked the driver to stay outside. He received a long-distance phone call and spoke for 20 straight minutes. The cab driver outside was getting very restless and was ringing the bell which turned out to be broken. Left with no other alternative the driver came in only to be bitten black and blue by Jimmy's Rottweiler. In a suit brought by the cab driver 

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

PRINCIPLE Whoever by words either spoken or intended to be read or by signs or by visible representations makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is to defame that person.

FACTS In a community, there is a custom of stealing shoes of the bridegroom during the marriage ceremony. The shoes of the bridegroom were stolen by 'Y'. 'A' announced that 'Z' has stolen the shoes. Everyone present in the marriage party started staring at 'Z' with great surprise. 'Z' felt very ashamed.

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

PRINCIPLES

I. A master is liable for the wrongful acts of his servant.
II. A person can be called a servant only if there is a relation of employment and he acts under the order and on behalf of his master.

FACTS

X bank launched a saving scheme for poor sections of the society and the customer can deposit ₹10 per day. Y, an unemployed youth, collected money from several customers, and on behalf of them deposited the money at the bank every day. The bank gave to Y a small commission. After some time, Y disappeared without depositing the money given by the customers. The customers bring a suit alleging that the bank is liable. Decide 

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

The railway authorities negligently allowed a train to be overcrowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose the appropriate answer.

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.

Principle: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.

Facts: During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who has a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighboring shops. The neighboring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant.
Which one of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

PRINCIPLE An owner of land has the right to use the land in any manner he or she desires. The owner of the land also owns the space above and the depths below it.

FACTS Ramesh owns an acre of land on the outskirts of Sullurpeta, Andhra Pradesh. The Government of India launches its satellites into space frequently from Sriharikota, near Sullurpeta. The Government of India does not deny that once the satellite launch has travelled the distance of almost 7000 kilometres it passes over Ramesh's property. Ramesh files a case claiming that the Government of India has violated his property rights by routing its satellite over his property, albeit 7000 kilometers directly above it.

Applying the principle to the case you would decide

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

PRINCIPLE Trespass is the unauthorized entry through the person or tangible object into the property of another. The rights of property exist on the surface, aerially and in the subterrain.

FACTS Kumari and Shravan lived in houses interspersed by the plot of Shantanu. Kumari and Shravan set-up a walkie talkie connection by setting up their transmitte~s facing each other. When Shantanu came to know about the arrangement, he filed a suit of trespass stating that the same was a case of trespass as signals could reach each other only by crossing his plot.

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

PRINCIPLE Assault is the use of words or gestures inducing a threat of force or danger to the person.

FACTS X and Y being friends were comparing stalwarts of their favourite football teams. X egged Y to go on and without realising it converted into a verbal sling fest and reduced to angry expletives. X and Y decided to file suits of verbal assault against each other.

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined
< prev  361 to 380 of 1023  next > 
Advertisements
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×