English

UG-CLAT entrance exam Important Questions

Advertisements
[object Object]
[object Object]
Subjects
Popular subjects
Topics

Please select a subject first

Advertisements
Advertisements
< prev  601 to 620 of 963  next > 

Consists of legal proposition(s)/  principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question.  
Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability, even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of the law.  
Therefore, to answer a question, the principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option. 

Principle: A contract would be invalid and unlawful if the contract is for any immoral or illegal purpose.

Facts: P, was a young and helpless widow, living on the pavement. R, a neighbor gave her a house, registered in her name, on the condition that she should allow R to keep his smuggled goods and drugs in her house. After the registration was done, according to the condition in the contract, R’s agents went to keep some packets in her house, she refused. R told her the condition under which the house was given to her. She still refused. Is P justified in her action?

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Contract Act (Entrance Exams)

The principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option

Principle: When a person consented to an act to be done by another, he cannot claim any damages resulting from doing that act, provided the act done is the same for which consent is given.

Facts: 'P' submitted written consent to a surgeon 'S' for undergoing a surgical operation for removal of appendicitis. The surgeon while doing  surgery also removed the gall bladder of 'A':

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)

Consists of legal proposition(s)/  principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question.  
Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability, even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of the law.  
Therefore, to answer a question, the principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option. 

Principle: A master shall be liable for the fraudulent acts of his servants committed in the course of employment. However, the master and third parties must exercise reasonable care in this regard.

Facts: Rahul was a door to door salesman with United Manufacturing Company (the Company). The Company was manufacturing Water Purifiers. Rahul, along with the Company’s products, used to carry Water Purifiers manufactured by his Cousin in a local Industrial Estate. He used to sell the local product at a lower rate giving the impression to the buyers that he is offering a discount on the Company’s product. Company Management detected the fraudulent activity of Rahul and dismissed him from service. Rahul still continued to carry on with his activity of selling the local product pretending that he was still a salesman of the Company. Several customers got cheated in this process. The fraud was noticed by the Company when the customer began to complain about the product. The customers demanded the Company to compensate for their loss.

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Legal Fundamentals and Terms (Entrance Exams)

The principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option

Principle: A person is said to do a thing fraudulently, if he does that thing with intent to defraud, but not otherwise.

Facts: 'A' occasionally hands over his ATM card to 'B' to withdraw money for 'A'. On one occasion 'B' without the knowledge of 'A', uses 'A's ATM card to find out the balance in 'A's account, but does not withdraw any money.

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)

The principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option

Principle: Assault is causing bodily injury to another person by use of physical force.

Facts: Rustum while entering into compartment of a train raised his fist in anger towards a person Sheetal, just in front of him in the row, to get way to enter into the train first, but did not hit him. Rustum has:

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)

Consists of legal proposition(s)/  principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question.  
Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability, even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of the law.  
Therefore, to answer a question, the principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option. 

Principle: Ownership in property consists of the right to possess, the right to use, the right to alienate, and the right to exclude others. The sale is complete when the property gets transferred from the seller to the buyer on sale.

Facts: ‘A’ sold his car to ‘B’. After this, ‘B’ requested ‘A’ to keep the car in his care on behalf ‘B’ for one month. ‘A’ agreed.

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Contract Act (Entrance Exams)

The principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option

Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general ‘duty to act fairly’.

Facts: ‘X’, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by ‘Y’, a female employee of the company that ‘X’ was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen. Is the dismissal of ‘X’ valid?

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)

Consists of legal proposition(s)/  principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question.  
Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability, even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of the law.  
Therefore, to answer a question, the principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option. 

Principle: When a person makes such a statement that lowers another person's reputation in the estimation of other persons, it is liable for committing defamation.

Facts: 'A' writes a letter to 'B' in which he uses abusive language against 'B' and also states that 'B' is a dishonest person. 'A' put the letter in a sealed envelope and delivered it to 'B'.

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

In pari delicto

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Turpis arbiter’ means:

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Caveat venditor

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Animus posssidendi’ means:

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Malus animus

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Lex loci

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Per incuriam

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

‘Sine die’ means:

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Bona vacantia

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

'Jus Gentium’ means:

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Pari passu

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

‘Punctum Temporis’ means:

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)
< prev  601 to 620 of 963  next > 
Advertisements
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×