English

Write the negation of the following statement. All the stars are shining if it is night. - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Write the negation of the following statement.

All the stars are shining if it is night.

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

Let q : All stars are shining.

p : It is night.

The given statement in symbolic form is p → q.

It’s negation is ~ (p → q) ≡ p ∧ ~ q

∴ The negation of a given statement is 'It is night and some stars are not shining'.

shaalaa.com

Notes

The answer in the textbook is incorrect.

  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.8 [Page 21]

APPEARS IN

RELATED QUESTIONS

Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]


Write the dual of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual of the following:

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the negation of the following statement.

Some continuous functions are differentiable.


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.


Choose the correct alternative:

If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?


The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.


Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×