English

Would it be correct to classify constitutions into written and unwritten constitutions in absolute terms? Argue your case with relevant examples from USA. - Political Science

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Would it be correct to classify constitutions into written and unwritten constitutions in absolute terms? Argue your case with relevant examples from USA.

Long Answer
Advertisements

Solution

No, it would not be correct to classify constitutions into written and unwritten in absolute terms, even in the case of the USA, which is known for its written constitution.

  1. The U.S. Constitution is written, but many important practices are unwritten, like:
      1. The President’s Cabinet: While the Constitution mentions the President's authority to seek advice from the heads of executive departments, the establishment of the Cabinet as a body is an unwritten convention.
      2. The Two-Term Tradition: The practice of a President serving only two terms was followed by tradition until the 22nd Amendment formally codified it in 1951.
  2. Judicial interpretations (e.g., judicial review) add meaning not written in the text.
shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 4: Constitution - EXAMINATION CORNER [Page 121]

APPEARS IN

K. K. Ghai Political Science [English] Class 12 ISC
Chapter 4 Constitution
EXAMINATION CORNER | Q 27. b | Page 121
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×