Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Supreme Court held that Preamble as a basic feature of Constitution cannot be amended in the case of
Options
Golaknath v. State of Punjab
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
MCQ
Advertisements
Solution
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Explanation:
Kesavanand Bharti vs State of Kerala in which it was held that Preamble is Part of the Constitution and is subject to the amending power of the parliament as any other provisions of the Constitution, provided the basic structure of the constitution is not destroyed.
shaalaa.com
Legal Terms and Maxims (Entrance Exam)
Is there an error in this question or solution?
