English

Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction. (p ∧ q) ∧ ~p - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

p q ~p p∧q (p∧q)∧~p
T T F T F
T F F F F
F T T F F
F F T F F

All the truth values in the last column are F. Hence, it is a contradiction.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.6 [Page 16]

APPEARS IN

RELATED QUESTIONS

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p


Show that the following statement pattern in contingency : 

(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)] 


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

~ p → (p → ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)


Using the truth table, verify.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)


Using the truth table, verify

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q


Write the dual of the following:

~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]


Write the dual of the following:

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.


Write the dual of the following.

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q


Choose the correct alternative:

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its


Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:

(p→q)∧(p→r)


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×