English

One way to think about work-life balance is with a concept known as The Four Burners Theory. What did the author realize about life at the end?

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

One way to think about work-life balance is with a concept known as The Four Burners Theory. Here's how it was first explained to me:

Imagine that your life is represented by a stove with four burners on it. Each burner symbolizes one major quadrant of your life.

  1. The first burner represents your family.
  2. The second burner is your friends.
  3. The third burner is your health.
  4. The fourth burner is your work.

The Four Burners Theory says that "in order to be successful, you have to cut off one of your burners. And in order to be really successful, you have to cut off two."

My initial reaction to The Four Burners Theory was to search for a way to bypass it. "Can I succeed and keep all four burners running?" I wondered.

Perhaps I could combine two burners. "What if I lumped family and friends into one category?"

Maybe I could combine health and work. "I hear sitting all day is unhealthy. What if I got a standing desk?" Now, I know what you are thinking. Believing that you will be healthy because you bought a standing desk is like believing you are a rebel because you ignored the fasten seatbelt sign on an airplane, but whatever.

Soon I realized I was inventing these workarounds because I didn't want to face the real issue life is filled with trade-offs. If you want to excel in your work and in your marriage, then your friends and your health may have to suffer. If you want to be healthy and succeed as a parent, then you might be forced to dial back your career ambitions. Of course, you are free to divide your time equally among all four burners, but you have to accept that you will never reach your full potential in any given area. Essentially, we are forced to choose. Would you rather live a life that is unbalanced, but high-performing in a certain area? Or would you rather live a life that is balanced, but never maximizes your potential in a given quadrant?

What did the author realize about life at the end?

Options

  • You don't get to keep everything you have in life 

  • Four burners theory is true and correct 

  • There is no shortcut to four burners theory in life 

  • All of the above

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

All of the above

Explanation:

After reading the section carefully, it is clear that the author is attempting to state all three ideas as the conclusion. It has been said that life is full of trade-offs. We are essentially compelled to make a decision.

shaalaa.com
Reading Comprehension (Entrance Exam)
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×