English

“Indian independence in 1947 marked a big, but ultimately only partial break with the colonial past.” Justify the statement. - Sociology

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

“Indian independence in 1947 marked a big, but ultimately only partial break with the colonial past.” Justify the statement.

Justify
Advertisements

Solution

  • Efforts to organise the “depressed classes” and particularly the untouchable castes predated the nationalist movement, having begun in the second half of the nineteenth century. This was an initiative taken from both ends of the caste spectrum, by upper-caste progressive reformers as well as by members of the lower castes.
  • The dominant view in the nationalist movement was to treat caste as a social evil and as a colonial ploy to divide Indians. But the nationalist leaders were able to simultaneously work for the upliftment of the lower castes, advocate the abolition of untouchability and other caste restrictions, and, at the same time, reassure the landowning upper castes that their interests, too, would be looked after. The post-Independence Indian state inherited and reflected these contradictions. On the one hand, the state was committed to the abolition of caste and explicitly wrote this into the Constitution. On the other hand, the state was both unable and unwilling to push through radical reforms which would have undermined the economic basis for caste inequality. At yet another level, the state assumed that if it operated in a caste-blind manner, this would automatically lead to the undermining of caste-based privileges and the eventual abolition of the institution.
shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2025-2026 (March) Board Sample Paper
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×