Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.
Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.
Advertisements
Solution
U : The set of all human beings.
M : The set of all members of the present Indian cricket.
C : The set of all committed members of the present Indian cricket.
The above Venn diagram represents the truth of the given statement, i.e. C - M = Φ
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p→q) ∧ q]→p
Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."
State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p ∧ q) → q
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Using the truth table, verify
p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)
Write the dual of the following:
~(p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p ∨ ~ q
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∧ r
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
Choose the correct alternative:
If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:
(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
