English

Examine whether the statement pattern [p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency. - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.

Chart
Advertisements

Solution

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]

p q r ~q ~q ∨ r p →
(~q ∨ r)
q → r p →
(q →r)
~[p →
(q → r)]
[p → (~q ∨ r)]
↔ ~[p → (q → r)]
T T T F T T T T F F
T T F F F F F F T F
T F T T T T T T F F
T F F T T T T T F F
F T T T T T T T F F
F T F F F T F T F F
F F T T T T T T F F
F F F T T T T T F F

All the truth values in the last column are F.

Hence, it is contradiction.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1.1: Mathematical Logic - Q.5

RELATED QUESTIONS

Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.

"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :

(p ∨ q) →  r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T


Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency.  (p →  q) ∧  (p ∧ ~ q ).


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

~ p → (p → ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Write the negation of the following statement.

Some continuous functions are differentiable.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Write the dual of the following.

(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)


Choose the correct alternative:

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its


Complete the truth table.

p q r q → r r → p (q → r) ˅ (r → p)
T T T T `square` T
T T F F `square` `square`
T F T T `square` T
T F F T `square` `square`
F T T `square` F T
F T F `square` T `square`
F F T `square` F T
F F F `square` T `square`

The given statement pattern is a `square`


The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.


Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:

(p→q)∧(p→r)


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×