English

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency. [~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)] - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

p q ~p ~q p∧q ~(p∧q) ~(p∧q)→p (~p)∧(~q) [~(p∧q)→p]↔[(~p)∧(~q)]
T T F F T F T F F
T F F T F T T F F
F T T F F T F F T
F F T T F T F T F

Truth values in the last column are not identical. Hence, it is contingency.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [Page 33]

APPEARS IN

Balbharati Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 4.13 | Page 33

RELATED QUESTIONS

Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.


By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency.  (p →  q) ∧  (p ∧ ~ q ).


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q.


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Write the negation of the following statement.

∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.


Write the negation of the following statement.

Some continuous functions are differentiable.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(p → r) ∧ q


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∧ r


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p


Write the dual of the following.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country


The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to ______. 


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:

(p→q)∧(p→r)


If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×