English

Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern. (~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

p q ~p ~q ~p∨q ~p∧~q (~p∨q)∧(~p∧~q)
T T F F T F F
T F F T F F F
F T T F T F F
F F T T T T T
shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [Page 33]

APPEARS IN

Balbharati Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 4.11 | Page 33

RELATED QUESTIONS

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.


Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table, verify.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)


Write the dual of the following:

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

~(p ∨ q) → r


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)


What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p


Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.

“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”


Choose the correct alternative:

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its


The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to ______. 


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×