English

Ayush, Chaman, and Govind were partners since 1st April 2017 and were sharing profits in a 3 : 2 : 1. However, they did not prepare a partnership deed. - Accounts

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Ayush, Chaman, and Govind were partners since 1st April 2017 and were sharing profits in a 3 : 2 : 1. However, they did not prepare a partnership deed. You are required to answer the following question for the year ending 31st March, 2024:

Ayush expressed his desire that his son Suyash be admitted as a partner for a 1/6th share, which he will forgo in his favour. Chaman has no objection to this, but Govind objects to this proposal.

Options

  • Suyash can be admitted since Ayush is forgoing his share of profit in favour of Suyash and remaining partners share of profit remains unaffected.

  • Suyash can be admitted since the majority partners (Ayush and Chaman) do not have any objection to his admission.

  • Suyash can be admitted even if Chaman and Govind both object to his admission.

  • Cannot be admitted since all partners should agree for admitting a new partner.

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

Cannot be admitted since all partners should agree for admitting a new partner.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Accounting for Partnership Firms - Fundamentals - CASE BASED MCQs - 6 [Page 1.104]

APPEARS IN

D. K. Goel Accountancy Volume 1 and 2 [English] Class 12 ISC
Chapter 1 Accounting for Partnership Firms - Fundamentals
CASE BASED MCQs - 6 | Q (c) | Page 1.104
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×