Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow:
| Shylock: | Shall I not have barely my principal'? |
| Portia: | Thou shalt have nothing but forfeiture. To be so taken at thy peril, Jew. |
- What is the 'principal' that Shylock asks for?
Why does Portia refuse to give it to him? [3] - What is the 'forfeiture' they are referring to?
What danger ('peril') would Shylock be in if he took the forfeiture? [3] - What further hold does the law of Venice have on Shylock? [3]
- What concession does Antonio offer to Shylock?
On what condition does he make this offer? [3] - Why is Shylock in a hurry to leave the courtroom after the trial?
How far can Shylock be blamed for the outcome of the trial?
Give one reason for your response. [4]
Advertisements
उत्तर
- In Act 4, Scene 1 of The Merchant of Venice, Portia refuses to return the principal amount to Shylock. This decision is a consequence of Shylock's earlier insistence on taking a pound of flesh from Antonio, rejecting pleas for mercy. Portia carries out her plan, acknowledging Shylock's right to the pound of flesh but emphasizing that the legal bond forbids him from spilling any blood. As Shylock seeks the life of a Venetian citizen, he becomes subject to Venice's laws. When Shylock requests his principal amount, Portia denies him, serving as her retribution for his merciless intentions and affirming her commitment to justice.
- In Act 4, Scene 1, of The Merchant of Venice, Shylock faces the risk of being charged with murder should he proceed with the forfeiture, insisting on extracting a pound of flesh from Antonio's body. According to Venetian law, any unauthorised Christian bloodshed during this act would result in the confiscation of his assets and property by the state of Venice. Consequently, Shylock places himself in significant jeopardy by pursuing his demand for a pound of flesh, risking the loss of all his possessions.
- Portia consents to the agreed forfeiture for Shylock. However, he must undertake this act entirely at his peril, extracting a pound of flesh from Antonio's body without causing any bloodshed. Any instance of shedding even a single drop of Christian blood would implicate him in conspiring to take the life of a Venetian citizen. Additionally, failure to cut precisely one pound of flesh, without any deviation, would result in the confiscation of all his lands and capital by the state. The state would take possession of half of his property, and the person who the plot against would receive the other half.
- According to the court order, the state must receive half of Shylock's estate, with Antonio, the injured party, receiving the remaining half. Although the duke proposes a compromise, suggesting a monetary fine instead of the state seizing half of Shylock's land, Shylock remains resentful and displeased. In response, Antonio makes an offer to relinquish his portion of Shylock's confiscated property under Venetian law. However, this offer comes with the condition that Shylock undergo a conversion to Christianity. Additionally, Jessica and Lorenzo, his daughter, will inherit Shylock's property after his passing.
-
In Act 4, Scene 1 of "The Merchant of Venice" by William Shakespeare, Shylock hastily leaves the courtroom, defeated and humiliated. His revenge plot against Antonio fails, resulting in his forced conversion to Christianity and the loss of half his wealth to Antonio. This devastating outcome deeply impacts Shylock's pride as a Jew. Faced with his vulnerable position in Venetian society, he quickly exits, possibly to escape further humiliation and contemplate rebuilding his life. Shylock's insistence on extracting a pound of flesh intensifies his disdain for him, eroding any potential sympathy due to his old age. He is unequivocally accountable for the consequences of the justice meted out.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Thinking about the Text
Answer these question.
At last a sympathetic audience.”
(i) Who says this?
(ii) Why does he say it?
(iii) Is he sarcastic or serious?
Here is a newspaper report of a young girl who went back in time to see how her home town looked seventy years ago.
Dehra Times
Purkul, 7 July, 2015
It is reported that Kareena, a twelve year old girl living in Purkul, went back in time using a time machine.
Seventy years ago her home town was an ideal place to live in. Her home town had not been invaded by the marvels of technology. Industries had not been set up then, so the air was not polluted. She could see children playing in the garden. Some children were listening to the stories told by their grandmothers. Happiness and contentment prevailed everywhere.
- Kareena’s hometown had not been invaded by the marvels of technology.
- Industries had not been set up.
- The air was not polluted.
- Some children were listening to stories told to them by their grandmothers.
Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow:
Lady Adela: Oh! Charlie, he did look so exactly as if he’d sold me a carpet when I was paying him.
Winsor: [changing into slippers] His father did sell carpets, wholesale, in the City.
Lady Adela: Really? And you say I haven’t intuition! [With a finger on her lips] Morison’s in there.
Winsor: [Motioning towards the door, which she shuts] Ronny Dancy took a tenner off him, anyway, before dinner.
(i) How did Dancy take a ‘tenner’ from De Levis?
How does De Levis later connect this trick with the theft?
(ii) Why, according to Lady Adela, did Dancy leave the army? Why does she call him reckless?
(iii) Where had De Levis kept the money which was stolen? Where had he gone after keeping the money? How much did he lose?
(iv) Why is Winsor outraged when De Levis says he had locked his door? What was the height of the room from the ground? How do they know that the thief did not use a ladder to climb up to De Levis’ room?
(v) How does General Canynge react when De Levis first accuses Dancy of committing the theft? What is your opinion of De Levis?
Give one reason to justify your answer.
Read the following sentences.
(a) If she knows we have a cat, Paati will leave the house.
(b) She won’t be so upset if she knows about the poor beggar with sores on his feet
(c) If the chappals do fit, will you really not mind?
Notice that each sentence consists of two parts. The first part begins with ‘if’. It is known as if-clause.
Rewrite each of the following pairs of sentences as a single sentence. Use ‘if’ at the beginning of the sentence
Study regularly. You’ll do well in the examination
Complete the sentence below by appropriately using anyone of the following:
if you want to/if you don’t want to/if you want him to
He’ll lend you his umbrella______________.
The author didn’t go for the bicycle ride he had planned with his friend why?
What did the narrator’s grandfather see at the zoo?
How did the mongoose oblige its master? What was the reward of his service?
What does the word ‘chasing in the extract mean?
Complete the following sentence by providing a reason.
In the short story, The Cookie Lady, Mrs. Drew wanted Bubber to keep visiting her because ______.
