Question

Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.

Fact: 'B' was formally invited by 'A' to his house. 'B' after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bedroom of the house. 'A' sued 'B' for trespass.

पर्याय

• 'B' has offended 'A' by moving to bedroom.

• 'B' has interfered with privacy of 'A'

• 'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bedroom.

• 'B' has committed no trespass as he entered the house with 'A's consent.

Answer 1

'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bedroom.

Explanation:

In trespass, the interference with the possession is direct and through some tangible object. The reasonable conclusion is drawn that B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bedroom.  Hence "'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bed room." correct.