Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.
Fact: 'B' was formally invited by 'A' to his house. 'B' after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bedroom of the house. 'A' sued 'B' for trespass.
पर्याय
'B' has offended 'A' by moving to bedroom.
'B' has interfered with privacy of 'A'
'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bedroom.
'B' has committed no trespass as he entered the house with 'A's consent.
Advertisements
उत्तर
'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bedroom.
Explanation:
In trespass, the interference with the possession is direct and through some tangible object. The reasonable conclusion is drawn that B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bedroom. Hence "'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bed room." correct.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Principle: When, at the desire one person, any other person has done or abstained from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.
Facts: X, the uncle of Y, made a promise to pay him an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- as a reward if Y quits smoking and drinking within one year. Y quit smoking and drinking within six months.
The question consists of legal propositions/principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true. In other words, in answering the following question, you must not rely on any principles except the principle that is given hereinbelow for the question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability.
Principle: A person is said to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract if, at the time, when he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and of forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon his interest.
Facts: X, who is usually of sound mind but occasionally of unsound mind enters into a contract with Y when he (X) is of unsound mind. Y came to know about this fact afterward and now wants to file a suit against X.
Given below is a Statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
Principle: Letters or words not describing the quality of things can be registered as a trademark.
Facts: Ram made an application for registration of alphabet 'B' written in a fancy style as a trademark to be applied on packets and cartons of shoes manufactured by him.
Principle: A person is said to have committed assault when apprehension is caused in the mind of a person that he is about to use physical force against his body.
Facts: 'A' abuses 'B' while he was sitting in a moving train, by aggressively shaking his fists when 'B' was standing on the railway platform at a distance.
Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:
Caveat venditor
Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:
'Jus Gentium’ means:
Examine the Statement and Conclusions given below and choose a suitable answer from the options given:
Statement: Necessity knows no law.
Conclusions:
1. The act of a captain throwing some cargo into the ocean to save the ship from sinking is justified by the principle.
2. The act of a man out of poverty and starvation stealing some food from a hotel is justified by the principle.
3. The act of a tourist killing a tiger when it was attacking a villager is justified by the principle.
Trade mark
Responsibility for Payment of wages is covered under section ____ of Payment of Wages Act
Local self-governance is an example of
