Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.
Fact: 'B' was formally invited by 'A' to his house. 'B' after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bedroom of the house. 'A' sued 'B' for trespass.
विकल्प
'B' has offended 'A' by moving to bedroom.
'B' has interfered with privacy of 'A'
'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bedroom.
'B' has committed no trespass as he entered the house with 'A's consent.
Advertisements
उत्तर
'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bedroom.
Explanation:
In trespass, the interference with the possession is direct and through some tangible object. The reasonable conclusion is drawn that B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bedroom. Hence "'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bed room." correct.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
In this Question, problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the question.
Rules
A. The act of using threats to force another person to enter into a contract is called coercion.
B. The act of using influence on another and taking undue advantage of that person is called undue influence.
C. In order to prove coercion, the existence of the use of threat, in any form and manner, is necessary. If coercion is proved, the person who has been so threatened can refuse to abide by the contract.
D. In order to prove undue-influence, there has to be a pre-existing relationship between the parties to a contract. The relationship has to be of such a nature that one is in a position to influence the other. If it is proven that there has been undue influence, the party who has been so influenced need not enforce the contract or perform his obligations under the contract.
Facts
Aadil and Baalu are best friends. Aadil is the son of a multi-millionaire business person, Chulbal who owns Maakhan Pharmaceuticals. Baalu is the son of a bank employee, Dhanraj. One day, Aadil is abducted from his office by Baalu. Chulbul receives a phone call from Dhamaj telling him that if he does not make Baalu the CEO of NIaakhan Pharmaceuticals, Aadil will be killed. Chulbul reluctantly agrees to make the Baalu the CEO. Subsequently, Chulbul and Baalu sign an employment contract. However, as soon as Aadil is released and safely returns home, Chulbul tells Baala that he shall not enforce the employment contract. Baalu and Dhanraj are not sure as to what is to be done next.
As per the rules and the given facts, who coerces whom:
Principle: A person is said to have committed assault when apprehension is caused in the mind of a person that he is about to use physical force against his body.
Facts: 'A' abuses 'B' while he was sitting in a moving train, by aggressively shaking his fists when 'B' was standing on the railway platform at a distance.
Choose the most appropriate option:
'obiter dicta' means-
Mark the best option:
A will or testament –
The right to information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 is a:
The following can not be exploited by assigning or by licensing the rights to others.
World Book and Copyright Day Celebrated by Unesco in
The Indian Patents & Design Act enacted in
Which of the following is not a category of copyright work in the CDPA?
In the case of railways, a person nominated by the _______________ for the specified area shall be liable for the payment of the wage to the employees.
