मराठी

Principles: a Person is Said to Abet the Doing of a Thing When He Instigates Any Other Person to Do that Thing. - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Principles:

• A person is said to abet the doing of a thing when he instigates any other person to do that thing.

• Mere acquiescence, however, does not amount to instigation.

Facts: 'A' says to 'B': I am going to kill 'C'." And, 'B' replies: "Do as you wish and take the consequences"; whereafter 'A' kills 'C'.

पर्याय

  • 'B' is jointly liable with 'A' for killing 'C'.

  • 'B' has not abetted 'A' to kill 'C'.

  • 'B' has abetted 'A' by conspiracy.

  • 'B' abetted 'A' to kill 'C'.

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

'B' abetted 'A' to kill 'C'.

Explanation:

Section 108 of IPC, A person abets an offence, who abets either. The commission of an act which would be an offence or the commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of committing an offence with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.  The abetment of the illegal omission of an act may amount to an offence although the abettor may not himself be bound is do that act.   
To constitute the offence of abetment it is not necessary that the act abetted should be committed or that the effect requisite is constituted the offence should be caused. The reasonable conclusion is drawn B abetted A to kill C. "‘B’ abetted ‘A’ to kill ‘C'" is correct. 

shaalaa.com
Study of Law (Entrance Exams)
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

In this Question problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the question. In answering the following question, you should not rely on any rule(s) except the rule(s) that are supplied for problem. Further, you should not assume any fact other than 'those stated in the problem. The aim is to test your ability to properly apply a rule to a given set of facts, even when the result is absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the aim to test any knowledge of law you may already possess. 

Rule: 
Whoever finds an unattended object can keep it unless the true owner claims that object. This does not affect the property owner's right to the ownership of the property on which the object is found. The right to ownership of a property does not include the right to ownership of unattended objects on that property. 

Facts: 
Elizabeth is the CEO of a global management services company in Chennai and is on her way to Ranchi to deliver the convocation address at India's leading business school on the outskirts of Ranchi. Flying business class on Dolphin Airlines, she is entitled to use the lounge owned by the airline in Chennai Airport while waiting for her flight. She finds a diamond ear-ring on the floor of the lounge and gives it to the staff of Dolphin Airlines expressly stating that in the event of nobody claiming the ear-ring within six months, she would claim it back. The airline sells the ear-ring after eight months and Elizabeth files a case to recover the value of the ear-ring from the airline when she is informed about its sale. To the original fact scenario, the following fact is added: In the lounge there are numerous signboards which proclaim 'Any unattended item will be confiscated by Dolphin Airlines'. In this case, you would:


The temporary release of a convicted prisoner from jail for a fixed period is called -


Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune, and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.

Facts: 'A' takes up a gun, not knowing whether it is loaded or not, points it playfully at 'B' and pulls the trigger. Consequently, 'B' falls dead.


Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Turpis arbiter’ means:


Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Malus animus


Examine the Statement and Conclusions given below and choose a suitable answer from the options given:

Statement: Necessity knows no law.

Conclusions:

1. The act of a captain throwing some cargo into the ocean to save the ship from sinking is justified by the principle.
2. The act of a man out of poverty and starvation stealing some food from a hotel is justified by the principle.
3. The act of a tourist killing a tiger when it was attacking a villager is justified by the principle.


Symbol of Maharaja of Air India is


Fixation of wage period is covered under section ____ of Payment of Wages Act


Local self-governance is an example of


Fill in the blanks: Choose the pair of words which complete the sentence to make logical sense.

The _____________ Legislative assembly on 31st March 2015 passed a controversial Anti-Terrorism Law. Earlier, the passed bill was rejected two times by the then ____________ in 2004 and 2008


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×