Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Principles:
• A person is said to abet the doing of a thing when he instigates any other person to do that thing.
• Mere acquiescence, however, does not amount to instigation.
Facts: 'A' says to 'B': I am going to kill 'C'." And, 'B' replies: "Do as you wish and take the consequences"; whereafter 'A' kills 'C'.
विकल्प
'B' is jointly liable with 'A' for killing 'C'.
'B' has not abetted 'A' to kill 'C'.
'B' has abetted 'A' by conspiracy.
'B' abetted 'A' to kill 'C'.
Advertisements
उत्तर
'B' abetted 'A' to kill 'C'.
Explanation:
Section 108 of IPC, A person abets an offence, who abets either. The commission of an act which would be an offence or the commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of committing an offence with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor. The abetment of the illegal omission of an act may amount to an offence although the abettor may not himself be bound is do that act.
To constitute the offence of abetment it is not necessary that the act abetted should be committed or that the effect requisite is constituted the offence should be caused. The reasonable conclusion is drawn B abetted A to kill C. "‘B’ abetted ‘A’ to kill ‘C'" is correct.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Principle: When, at the desire one person, any other person has done or abstained from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.
Facts: X, the uncle of Y, made a promise to pay him an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- as a reward if Y quits smoking and drinking within one year. Y quit smoking and drinking within six months.
The question consists of legal propositions/principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true. In other words, in answering the following question, you must not rely on any principles except the principle that is given hereinbelow for the question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability.
Principle: A person is said to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract if, at the time, when he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and of forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon his interest.
Facts: X, who is usually of sound mind but occasionally of unsound mind enters into a contract with Y when he (X) is of unsound mind. Y came to know about this fact afterward and now wants to file a suit against X.
The question consists of two statements, one labelled as principle and other as Fact. You are to exa.mine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.
PRINCIPLE: Preparation is not an offense except the preparation of some special offenses.
FACT: Ramesh keeps poisoned halua in his house, wishing to kill Binoy whom he invited to a party and to whom he wishes to give it Unknown to Ramesh. his only son takes the halua and dies. In this case.
Choose the most appropriate option:
'obiter dicta' means-
Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:
Lex loci
Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:
Autrefois convict
Mark the best option:
English Law is also known as
Mark the best option:
‘Res Judicata’ is a term used to describe -
Mark the best option:
Forum non-convenience means –
The Copyright Act, 1957 came into effect from
