Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
In a bag, there are some gold coins. In another bag, there are 1/3rd extra gold coins as compared to the first bag. If the difference in the number of gold coins in the first and second bag is 5, then how many coins are there in the first bag?
पर्याय
7
9
13
15
Advertisements
उत्तर
15
Explanation:
Difference in the number of coins in two bags
`=1/3`rd of the number of coins in the first bag
So, `1/3 xx` Number of coins in first bag = 5
Number of coins in the first bag = 5 × 3 = 15
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Answer the question based on the information given.
A highly cohesive workgroup is a prerequisite for high team performance. Sociologists point out that the association between group cohesion and success is owing to the support individual team members give to one another and their acceptance of the group's goals and activities.
Each of the following, if true, either provides support for or cannot weaken the sociologists' assumption about the relationship between cohesion and success EXCEPT
Choose the most appropriate option:
If Oceans are Deserts, then Waves are:
Find the odd one out from the following:
Paw : Cat :: Hoof : ?
Solve the following question and mark the most appropriate option.
In a family of six, there are three men A, B, and C, and three women R, S, and T. The six persons are Architect, Lawyer, CA, Professor, Doctor, and an Engineer by profession but not in the same order. There are two married couples and two unmarried persons. C is not R's husband. The Doctor is married to a Lawyer. R's grandfather is a Professor. Bis neither A's son nor he is an Architect or a Professor. The Lawyer is T's daughter-in-law. C is T's son and the Engineer's father. A is married to the CA.
Which among the following is the correct pair of married couples?
Melt : Liquid :: Freeze : ?
Cloth : Mill :: Newspaper : ?
In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by four arguments numbered I, II, III, and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should all the management institutes in the country be brought under government control?
Arguments
- No, the government does not have adequate resources to run such institutes effectively.
- No, each institute should be given the freedom to function on its own.
- Yes, this will enable to have standarised education for all the students.
- Yes, only then the quality of education would be improved.
In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement
- The majority of Indian labourers belong to the unorganised sector and most of them earn very low.
Conclusions
- The labourers belonging to the organised sector have better benefits and stability.
- Some labourers belonging to the unorganised sector have a regular and certain income.
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and ill. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement
- Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?
Arguments
- No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
- Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
- Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.
