Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Find the odd one out :
Onlookers, Theatre goers, Queue, Spectators
पर्याय
Onlookers
Theatre goers
Queue
Spectators
Advertisements
उत्तर
Queue
Explanation:
Here, Queue is different from the other three, Onlookers, Theatergoers and spectators.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The following question has two statements P and Q. They may look factually absurd. You have to ignore this absurdly and concentrate only upon the logic involved in its statement.
Mark the answer as
P: Jackals live in forests. Cities are in forests. Therefore jackals live in cities.
Q: Some tables are grass. All stools are grass. Therefore all tables are stools.
Read the following information for a question and chose the most appropriate option:
P and Q are good at driving the Motorcycle and Jeep. R and P are good in driving Jeep and Lorry. R, S, and T are good at driving Motor Cycle and Lorry. T and R are good at driving buses and Tempo. S and Q are good at driving Bus and Jeep.
Who is good at driving the motor Cycle, Jeep and Lorry but not a bus?
Find the odd-man-out:
Choose the best option that correctly classifies the four sentences as a :
F: Fact: if it relates to a known matter of direct observation, or an existing reality or something known to be true
J: Judgment: If it is an opinion or estimate or anticipation of common sense or intention.
I: Inference: If it is a logical conclusion or deduction about something based:I on the knowledge of facts.
A. Everyday social life is impossible without interpersonal relationships.
B. The root of many misunderstandings has been cited in poor relations individuals.
C. Assuming the above to be true. social life will be much better if people understand the importance of good interpersonal relations.
D. A study reveals that interpersonal relations and hence life, in general, can be improved with a little effort on the part of individuals.
Choose the pair of words from the options that best represents a similar relationship as the one expressed in the following pair of words.
Waiter: Restaurant
Flow : River :: Stagnant : ?
Solve the following question and mark the most appropriate option.
In a family of six, there are three men A, B, and C, and three women R, S, and T. The six persons are Architect, Lawyer, CA, Professor, Doctor, and an Engineer by profession but not in the same order. There are two married couples and two unmarried persons. C is not R's husband. The Doctor is married to a Lawyer. R's grandfather is a Professor. Bis neither A's son nor he is an Architect or a Professor. The Lawyer is T's daughter-in-law. C is T's son and the Engineer's father. A is married to the CA.
Which among the following is the correct pair of married couples?
Read the following case and answer the question.
Sakshi is the Vice-President in an electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request "Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team. Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen's former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience. Lalit has described Kishen as to author it alive to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an ailing wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife.
Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above
I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen visit a family counsellor.
Which of the following statements, if true would weaken the decision to sack Kishen the most?
The question has a main statement, followed by four statements labeled I, II, III, and IV. Choose the ordered pair of statements, where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logical with the main statement.
Every player will become a champ.
- Rajesh is a player.
- Rajesh will become champ.
- Rajesh is not a player.
- Rajesh will not become a champ.
The question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. The course of action is a step for administrative decisions to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the given suggested courses of action is/are logically worth pursuing.
Statement Despite the good economic progress of the country, the significant number of under-nourished cb.ildren has been observed in the rural parts of the country.
Courses of Action
I. The government should increase the Wealth Tax/ Income Tax and use that money for the upliftment of the deprived class.
II. The government should introduce schemes like free meals in primary schools and make primary education compulsory.
