मराठी

P If 1 × 7 = 8, 2 × 7 = 16, 3 × 7 = 24, 4 × 7 = 32, Then What is Value of 9 × 7?

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

If 1 × 7 = 8, 2 × 7 = 16, 3 × 7 = 24, 4 × 7 = 32, then what is value of  9 × 7? 

पर्याय

  • 63

  • 72

  • 81

  • 90

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

72

Explanation:

1 × 7 = (1 + 7) × 1 = 8

2 × 7 = 2 × (7 + 1) = 16

3 × 7 = 3 × (7 + 1) = 24

4 × 7 = 4 × (7 + 1) = 32

Similarly,

9 × 7 = 9 × (7 + 1) = 72

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2018-2019 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Four statements are given below. Group two of them in such a way that one is logically incorrect and the other is verifiable as a matter of fact-

(a) The Sun does not rise in the East.
(b) A straight line is the shortest distance between any two points.
(c) Every circle has a center.
(d) The maximum duration of a total solar eclipse is about 7.5 minute.


Identify the statement which cannot be true


Paw : Cat :: Hoof : ?


If G secures 20 marks more than F then what will be the expected marks of A and D respectively?


Given below is a passage followed by a statement about that passage. You must select one of the following answers:
Mediators recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold mediator - client confidentiality, however, there are situations that may occur where the mediator is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the mediator is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the mediator is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client; however, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.
Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to anti-national activities; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Mediation service providers and mediators practicing independently have their own boundaries but must agree with this contractually with their client at the outset of the client - counsel relationship.
When a client reports their involvement in a serious crime, their Mediators is legally obliged to report this?

Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the question below that  passage.
Arbitrator: The shipping manager admits that he decided to close the old facility on October 14 and to schedule the new facility's opening for October 17, the following Monday. But he also claims that he is not responsible for the business that was lost due to the new facility's failing to open as scheduled. He blames the contractor for not finishing on time, but he too, is to blame, for he was aware of the contractor's typical delays and should have planned for this contingency.

Which one of the following principles underlies the arbitrator's argument?


The following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and IIIYou have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements

Statements

  1. Water has a shape, has volume.
  2. The knowledge is like water, flowing from one side to another.

Conclusions

  1. Knowledge is interdisciplinary.
  2. The knowledge is bound within a specific area.
  3. Knowledge influences the core of mental activity directly.

In the following question, a statement/group of statements is given followed by four conclusions. Choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statements.

Statement

  1. All the students in my class are intelligent.
  2. Rashmi is not intelligent.

In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and ill. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement

  • Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?

Arguments

  1. No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
  2. Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
  3. Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.

In the following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and m. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements.

Statements

  1. Most of the 64 number of buses go to my office.
  2. This is the 64 number bus.

Conclusions

  1. This bus goes to my office.
  2. This bus does not go to my office.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×